Why women consider weaker then man by birth?

Question

Why women consider weaker then man by birth?

Answer 1

because men are physically stronger!!!

Answer 2

Grammar, please.

Correction to last post: all men are not physically stronger than all women. Be careful when you generalize.

Answer 3

Because men are generally taller and have more muscle mass.

Answer 4

Genious, I couldn't have said it better.

I can't tell you how many times I've taken someone by surprise by being knowlegable in a subject that isn't shopping/cooking. Their eyes will go wide, they'll even eye me up and down as if to make sure I was actually a woman, even if I only articulated a very rudimentary concept in a particular subject.

I've actually had one man say "Oh my, a woman who doesn't use "like" in every sentence".

I'll bring up Hillary Clinton simply because she's the most obvious female political figure. When she choked up during an interview the media tore her to shreds, declaring "she's too emotional. She can't be commander in chief if she can't handle the primaries". For anyone who didn't watch the event, it would seem as if she had a full on temper tantrum, when in fact all she did was tear up for about 3 minutes.

The media glazes over, if not praises men who shed a tear for a subject that touches close to home (Both Mit Romney, John Mccain, Bush and many others have choked up during interviews). The fiasco demonstrated that there is still an innate belief that a woman is too emotional to run the country.

Answer 5

Women are physically weaker than men, this is a fact of life, they are 'considered' weaker because they are.

Answer 6

I’ve never understood why “Men are strong, Women are weak” gets brought up in this day and age, anyway.

Except for a few select fields, being strong isn’t something that really matters anymore. How many of us work, say, behind a desk? On a computer? In a retail job punching keys on a register? For most of us, we have very few times when we’d need to deal with being strong, anyway.

And if the average man is stronger than the average woman, what about the ways that the average women beats out men? What about endurance, or balance, or steadyness (is there a better term for the ability to hold a pose without shaking?)

And what about the differences within the set? Even if we agree that the average man is stronger than the average woman, what does that really tell us when we know that the variation within the set “men” is greater than the difference between “average man” and “average woman”?

But, of course, that doesn’t matter when some jackass decides “Women shouldn’t be X, Y, or Z because women are weaker.” Nevermind that most men couldn’t meet the requirments necessary to be a fire-fighter or a fighter-pilot or X, Y, or Z.

Oh, no.

And gods forbid that you notice a situation where the “average woman’s” physical differences would be an advantage, because it’ll come back to the strength thing.

The average woman is smaller framed than a man, and would be a better fit in the cockpit of a tank or a jet? Oh, well… she’s weaker than a man, so no. Also, what happens if she’s captured by the enemy? What then?!

The problem is that “Women aren’t as strong as men” hasn’t gone away. I can’t count the number of times I’ve heard people say it, or some variation on it. And it exists in many different forms, all of which ultimately come down to “men are better than women.”

In business, people don’t say it in the open very often, but it’s a sentiment that’s there. It creeps out in conversations about how “women don’t succeed at the upper levels because they take time off for children” regardless of whether the women in question have children or even the desire for them. It creeps in when people talk about the wage gap, and someone says “Well, you can’t lump it up to sexism, maybe women just aren’t as good at negotiating pay as men are.” It’s this talk about inherent differences between women and men- women are X, men are Y, and Y is inevitably better.

One thing, though. There are certain advantages to being called the weaker s*x (when really women are not). It makes one underestimated, which is important in business if you are playing the political games that are inevitable in the halls of power.

It’s one thing to want people to underestimate you on certain issues. There’s a difference between playing political games to create an advantage for yourself and being viewed as inferior by virtue of your s*x. A man playing political games has the benefit of being able to choose to play that game. If I come to work and keep my mouth shut on an issue and pretend not to know that much about it so that when I do speak and show what I know it takes my opposition by surprise, that’s a choice I got to make. When I do speak and show my stuff, I’m likely to be taken seriously, because I’ve shown I know my stuff. When a woman goes into an office and isn’t taken seriously because she’s got a v****a, it’s not her choice to play those games, and even if she proves that she knows her stuff, she’s still likely to be judged based in part on her s*x. Look how women political figures are treated- they’re judged by their dress, by their attractiveness, by their children, and, eventually, by what they might actually say.

Answer 7

Females are stronger when they are still fetuses. That is why when there is a boy and a girl twin and the mother does drugs the boy usually is affected and not the girl.

Around age 12 boys become A LOT stronger then girls.

Answer 8

No.  More female fetuses survive till delivery than male fetuses.  So that means the females are stronger.

Answer 9

Its not a matter of human consideration, The Creator knows better. He has created whatever. And God can never be wrong.

Answer 10

"No. More female fetuses survive till delivery than male fetuses. So that means the females are stronger."

This is a half truism. The default baby is a female baby, androgen absorption at the right time results in the masculization of the fetus. This process is very tricky and uses a lot of resources from the mother, resulting in the male baby being much more sensitive to homeostatic imbalance, and so is therefore physiologically weaker.