Why would a philosopher use anger and violence as the final solution?

Question

...thank you for sharing...

Answer 1

They could be bitter about the question and their true colors are coming out at the end! LOL thats my experience with professors/scholarly worded documents.

Answer 2

Gentlemen, our enemy has shown no signs of changing his ways. His barbaric antics have cost all of us family, property and self-respect. Now, right now we have one last chance. This is our last hope of stopping him from destroying us completely or enslaving our population. Let us do the unthinkable and destroy him in a way we have sworn never to inflict such damage on another society, as a way to preserve ourselves.

Answer 3

Because in philosophy, the only wrong answers are the ones that go unpondered.  Anger and violence may not be the best way to handle certain things, but there's no doubt that it's more powerful than anything else the human race could possibly obtain.

Answer 4

frustration, ask Mao, Marx.

Answer 5

who knows, honestly.

It was what was on their mind- an opinion.

Everybody has them, his or hers just must have been a little violent?

Maybe they had a rough child life or life in general?

Or they believe fighting is a way of protection?

Again, who knows.

:)

violence should never be the answer.