Question:

Why would fostering be better than adoption?

by Guest60319  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

I know that in the USA things are more "contraversial" with reguards to adoption. I have been told its all about money. (puke)

Anyway, I just want to know how people think that fostering is better for the child? I have a best friend who was in foster care, and all the way through his life, he was moved on and on to different homes. He was never given a family and has never called anyone mum or dad.

In my opinion, fostering isnt stable for a child at all. The foster parents must get attatched also, and it must break their heart when one of the kids are leaving. How is that beneficial to the child?

I am not against fostering by the way, before anyone starts on me.

I just think it like a temporary home.

 Tags:

   Report

4 ANSWERS


  1. you can adopt a foster child. we take in foster infants. when one is available, we'll adopt 'em.

    we want to be there for them and help lay a healthy foundation. i stay home with them and give lots of attention/love.

    it's not better for them, but it happens and people are needed to help!


  2. I agree with you.  I think what people are referring to is that the kids in foster care deserve to be adopted first, rather than ignored  and overlooked  in favour of obtaining a baybeeeeee at all costs.

  3. For some reason it seems to adoption is getting a bad name here- and I cannot figure it out- not that some adoption experiences are not good- any more than any biological family is always good or bad either. I agree if a child is never adopted she/he can go from home to home, and where is the stability there- I felt very secure being an adopted child- and before some people give me 10 thumbs down, listen to what I said= I had a good secure home life as an adoptee- and my children are adopted as well, and so have they.  A foster home is good, do not misunderstand me, especially if that child has a chance of going to live with his/her birth family again- however if that child is going to be passed between families until they are 18- no way-  that cannot be good on the child.

  4. I haven't seen anyone suggest that being passed around from foster home to foster home is better than being adopted.  I have, however, seen lots and lots of suggestions to people that adoption should focus more on getting children stuck in foster care into adoptive homes.

    I don't see much of adoption, in and of itself, getting a bad rap, either.  I do see many people who want to see changes in how adoption is **legislated** and **practiced** in the U.S.  These issues have nothing to do with whether or not someone had a "bad" or "good" adoption experience in their adoptive homes.  Plenty of people who have great relationships with their adoptive families would like to see changes in the system and laws that run adoption.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 4 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.