Question:

Why would people think that Palin's youngest baby is really Bristol's?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

It's not as if Sarah Palin could have been hiding for nine months while being governor and then suddenly pop up with a newborn baby. Didn't people see her when she was pregnant? So how come people say that the baby really belongs to her daughter Bristol?

 Tags:

   Report

27 ANSWERS


  1. for the same reason that Fox news reported that Obama was a muslim  


  2. WHY on earth would you hold a pregnancy reveal until the 7th months. SAY WHAT? Be proud of your child and pregnancy to reveal it from the get go.

    COVER UP!!!!!!!!!

  3. The world of politics can be wicked. The extreme left is trying to make any trouble they can by defacing a good woman. They know the republicans made an excellent choice for vice president in Palin.

  4. You would think this would easily be discredited if it were not true.  So where are the pictures of a pregnant governor?  What gives?  And about the 4 month old baby and the 5 month pregnancy:  if the baby was born April 18 then that makes him 4.5 months old.  That's pretty close to the 5 month pregnancy, if indeed it is 5 months.  Therefore, it is possible.  Women can easily get pregnant again right after the birth of a baby.  And the fact the baby has Downs, although more commonly born to older mothers is not exclusive to older mothers.

  5. exactly people did see her.

    that's why the story is out now nationally now.

    this has always been around, we just didn't know about t*t cause it only effected Alaska at that time.

  6. People were suspicious because Bristol was absent from school for a period between 5 & 8 months. When that happens at a Catholic school, it is generally because the girl is pregnant. This particular rumor appears to be false as it would be difficult for Bristol to be 5 months pregnant 4 months after giving birth.

  7. it just proves that people will listen before there are any facts

    that is way conspiracy theories come into play

  8. It was an ugly attempt by the Obama campaign to discredit her.

    They even went so far as to photoshop pictures from last year to make Bristol look 6 months pregnant.

    I think it is hilarious that the hard truth (that Bristol is currently 5 months pregnant and therefore could NOT have been pregnant with the youngest Palin boy) exposed some low-down dirty campaigning by the Obama team.

  9. reasoning has nothing to do with it!  Tell a lie enough times, and people believe it.  It works.  I see it all the time.

  10. That's yesterday's news.  Gov. Palin announced her prenency at 7 months and was not "showing," thats why.  And her daughter was not showing up as school and putting on weight.

    Fast forward 24 hours.

    The Palins come clean.  The baby could not have been Bristol's.  Why?  Because Bristol is pregnant, that is why.  

    GASP

  11. get serious

  12. Wyclef Jean said "...when you roll up in the carnival anything can happen..." I say "...when you roll up in the trailer park anything can happen..." so it's anyone's guess but I seriously doubt the baby is Peggy Bundy's. Why would the mother throw an infant special needs baby...to quote Rush Limbaugh "under the bus" for political ambition?

  13. The baby is 4 months old...

    and Bristol's 5 months pregnant.

    It makes no sense why they keep up these rumors.

  14. They said she didn't look pregnant late in the pregnancy. I'm pretty sure that's been debunked, though.

  15. They're evil a$$holes

  16. Because her daughter had more visible curves than her mother.  

  17. Because they are shallow idiots.

    Barack Hussein Obama has been preaching that his wife and kids are off limits and trying to come off as being so respectful of women by allowing Hillary to kiss his @$$ in public then he goes and smears rumors about Sarah Palin and her family and the news stations that are backing him are flooding their channels with this bull story of how Palin supposedly covered her daughters pregnancy.

    Lets see how Barack likes attention on his little bebe's kids when they reach their teen years and are associated with crack dealers and thugs. KARMA is a *********

  18. haven't you seen desperate housewives. is that easy!!!!!

  19. Sarah never had a baby bump and the baby's inbred.  

  20. They dont understand simple biology which states a woman who is 5 months pregnant could not be the mother of a 4 month old baby.

  21. Because people love to talk about what they don't know. Their lives are empty and need people's business to fill them up....bd

  22. Apparently there were some odd coincedences during the pregnancy.  

    Palin didn't announce it until she was 7 months pregnant and contemporary reports say she didn't LOOK pregnant.

    She was traveling to Texas when she went into labor and insisted on flying back to Alaska.  

    Her water broke.  She passed up TWO large hospitals in Anchorage with the state's best neonatal centers to travel several hours to Wasilla.

    Her daughter was absent from school for several months during the pregnancy period.

    Finally, Trig is supposed to be just about 5 months old (April 18th) and the daughter is REPORTED to be 5 months pregnant.

  23. They will do anything to smear the opposition and get their messiah elected

  24. Their stupid, and grasping at straws.

    the whole attacking of Bristol is pretty sad, and VERY low class.

  25. They have nothing better to do, but dig and bring up dirt.  

  26. Because they' morons.  The baby was born in April, and Bristol is already I believe 5 months pregnant.  Just not likely.  And the healthiest age to have a baby is 16-24, and wouldn't have a child with Downs Syndrome.  People are just douche bags and don't know the appropriate way to debate.

  27. They're a bit on the ignorant side if they believed that but I guess that story is put to rest since Sarah Palin's daughter is pregnant.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 27 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.