Why would the bears not want favre

Question

I am sure including the bears in the Farve rumors pissed off the management of the bears. Regardless of where Favre goes he is going to be the center of the team. With the bears indecision of what quarter back to use why would they be so cocky in their regards to that position. Bears quarter backs are lucky to play in a whole game, never mind several seasons back to back. I know we should all be happy because 2 seasons ago almostt wining the play offs, but before that the defense was getting spent up and they could not do anything with the ball. I would be happy spending 300 each ticket (like I do) to see favre for 2 years for 20 mill. Bears are too busy trying to make money.

Answer 1

I think they would if they could get him....Their QBs are so terrible.....

Answer 2

The Packers told farve  that they would trade him but not to an NFC North team like the bears or the vikings i live in green bay and believe me i would for sure buy a farve jersey in any of those teams colors  

Answer 3

Favre would not be the fix in Chi town

Answer 4

they want to but the packers wont trade him within the division cuz they know they will get beat!!!lol

Answer 5

bcuz they dont want him they are better off w/o brett farve

Answer 6

Well first, the bears can't get Favre because he has stated repeatedly that he will not go to division rivals which the bears are in by sharing the NFC North with the Packers.

And second, the bears want to win.  I know they don't have a solid QB, but it is questionable bringing in a foreign QB to a new team in the middle of August and want him to take over the starting role within arguably the most team-oriented team game.

It doesn't make sense for most teams, especially the bears.

Answer 7

The Bears cant get Farve because the Packers will not trade him to any teams in their division.  Which is sad for him because he wants to play them twice a year.  Looks like that will not happen.  

Answer 8

Because they want to maintain their crappy team as is - terrible QBs, terrible RBs, and terrible WRs.  Anybody who insists that Chicago is better off without Favre is an absolute idiot.  One poster said that they don't need Favre since they already have 2 good QBs.  What?????  Hahahahahahahahaha.

LMAO!

Answer 9

they want to stay sucking

Answer 10

I thought he was a stand up guy.................The past few months have shown hm to be a whiney jerk(IMHO). The last game  he played showed he doesn't havemany of his tools anymore.........

I would rather have a young guy who can get better than a crybaby who will only get worse

Answer 11

The Halas family is cheap.

Answer 12

Well, I have one theory as to why the Bears would not want Farve, and that would be that the organization wants to show a sign of committment.  You see, I agree with you that the Bears QB's are terrible and have been for quite sometime.  However Lovie Smith believes in Rex Grossman for some crazy reason.  Grossman has shown signs of promise, because we saw that with the super bowl season.  However I think its all about staying committed to your guy.  Lovie Smith answered questions about Grossman and stated many times, "He is our QB".  So to me, I think its an issue of already being committed and also being proud that they can be successful without Brett Favre.  Now you know and I know that the Bears would be 10 times better off with Favre, but they are too proud and too committed for their own good.  Maybe when they have a couple of 4-12 seasons they will wise up and get a new QB even if it isn't Favre..