Gregory Maguire was the author of Wicked and it's a fab story! But I think the musical is better. :D
He's suggesting a film soon! It's coming out in 2012, I think.
Anyway, my question is that I'm comparing the two wondorous stories Wicked and Mary Poppins, because the musicals were both very different from the books.
However, Gregory Maguire saw Wicked on stage and he loved it! I mean, who wouldn't? It's a masterpiece!
But the musical was aimed at a suitable audience because the book was a lot more adult-themed.
But Pamela Travers saw the Mary Poppins film, and there was a big problem there.
Reporters had said she went out of the theater ranting and took a big dislike toward Walt Disney for ruining Mary Poppins, saying it was too much and very sugar-coated.
That's a big difference between the authors of Wicked and Mary Poppins.
Gregory loved his adaptian of Wicked the musical, but Pamela despised the Mary Poppins film, which I can understand and I agree on her behalf because I would be fairly angry if someone had made the adaptian very inaccurate.
But both are different from the author's screenplay writing.
I'm just wondering why Gregory didn't really care that Wicked was different from the book, but Pamela didn't like it when they changed Mary Poppins.
Tags: