Will Fevola drop off now that he has re-signed ?

Question

He has gone off the boil before when he has got what he wants, the blues should have kept him hungry and waited until seasons end

Answer 1

I agree with you on that one!

He will definitely drop off now that he has his money. Fev is not a team player.

Answer 2

Yes.

No.

Maybe.

Who cares?

Answer 3

No you wouldn't think so.

Answer 4

I agree, they should have waited. But maybe this will make fev see how valuable he is when he is on form?? I'm not sure.  

Answer 5

I think he will continue to get good supply from the midfield and still kick alot of goals but because of his own ego he could drop off and play lazy football.

While this has been a fairly consistent year for him, it will be interesting to see how he preforms next year. that may answer your question better.

Answer 6

Will it make any difference whether he is hot or cold? Carlton have as much chance of making the finals as Melbourne has.

The Blues will regret the day that the paid fevola so much money. He should have been offered a one year deal & if he didn't like that he could nick off.

Answer 7

i dont think so

as long as he has judd, stevens & waite feeding him the ball he should be fine

carlton are as good chance as anyone from 5th place down to make the finals

they played their best game in about 5 years last week vs the dogs

Answer 8

My sentiments exactly Gaz,  for the people saying 'we need him, without him we wouldnt be scoring goals' etc, i read that from some einstein last night,  my answer to that would be, he was there last year and the year b4 that etc etc,  didnt carlton finish well last year with FEVOLA at full forward, not!.

The blues should of a/holed him for trying to get 4 years out of them, which 3 would of been average and the last 1 good.  He's a selfish type of  human being, plays up on his missus etc, bags his team mates every week without fail, if Carlton fans say he doesn't they have  their heads in the sand.

He is a decent footballer, when it suits him, (hence the selfish remark above)