Will an androgynous race supersede the human race in the near future?

Question

Society has been revolutionizing itself in many ways. The gap is narrowing between male and female s*x differences. Female waistlines are also broader now than in previous decades, and if this is biological and not due to the advent of corsets, this signifies that females are now producing more testosterone than in the past.

Answer 1

Many feminists would be happy to see this because then the world will have changed to be like them.

Answer 2

Yes, thankfully, and it can't happen soon enough.

Psychological androgyny "predict[s] greater interpersonal competence and transsituational adaptability than do traditionally s*x-typed role orientations."

http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=main...

There is no evidence for your ridiculous claim though.

Answer 3

That's a new one...

Answer 4

Definitely not.

As has been observed before...  It takes catastrophic failure to bring about a good change in society.  We are currently in a downward trend to become a completely gynocentric society.

It is already gynocentric, but not absolute.  An absolute gynocentric society would be rock bottom...  completely catastrophic.  At that point, a great change will happen.  Men will finally stop letting women get away with all the BS and put a stop to the downfall of society.

It's not that women are overall incompetent, but trying to get a carpenter to fix your computer is just plain foolish.  Even if they have the right to do it, it doesn't mean they are capable.

And, while some carpenters may be able to fix your computer, most aren't.  Changing a general view based on the exception only messes things up.

There's a difference between creating opportunities and enforcing them.  Feminists simply don't understand that and still are indoctrinating innocent females into their ranks...  Drawing them astray from what their natural tendencies are.  Creating a false world of idealism where being submissive to your man is simply unacceptable while most of the female population would be perfectly happy with it if it weren't for the early-on brainwashing.  It's "not fair" or "not equal".  Sure, we could all add negative connotations to anything and convince people it's bad.  But dang, let's not ruin peoples' lives for the sake of your own ideals, mmmmkay?  That's just plain selfish.

Answer 5

s**y thought, but no.

Answer 6

doubtful. Human beings still have basic desires when it comes to "mate" selection.

        I think it would take (without genetic engineering) at least 600,000 years for something like that to happen if at all.

       There is no gap other than what society imposes upon it's citizen's.

Each gender has it's biological similarities and differences.

       Some people regardless of there gender remain trapped by the basic biological instincts.

      Others are more capable of moving past that, using one of the greatest things on this world; The human mind and spirit.

        I suppose many gender and race talk would be moot if our educational system taught people not what to think but how to think for themselves.

       The mind like a blade is of better use when kept sharp.

    

More likely humanity will split off into two different species    within the next 10,000-100,000 years based upon nutrition,technological and environmental differences between various regions of the planet.

-------

Sadly You might be right about that. Or maybe individualism is like a flame. It stays warm in a few but every once and awhile it spreads like a wild fire.

Answer 7

I really don't think that's possible |:..

The gap doesn't have to do with evolution, of course, women may now have a better nutrition, i think that everyone is getting a better nutrition....

I think that is more about growth in the population, in basically all the world, people are getting taller and wider.

It can also be because there are also more people who are  overweight.

I guess that the taller a woman is, the more testosterone is produced, still i don't think that women are getting more testosterone aside from that, if they would thet would have beards, corporal hair everywhere(more), wider backs, more muscle mass, larger pectorals and probably lesser female sexual characteristics.

Also, if this was true...they would be stronger...but there is no reason for them to grow male genitals....and even less reason for men to grow female genitals and b*****s -_-

Also, people who have sedentary lifestyles, produce less testosterone than an athlete, and in the past, people where more athletic, so we may actually all be producing less testosterone than we should :P

And if there is an evolution and this is to happend it will happend in 2347623 million years, when this human race has ended life on earth :P

Still, larger waistlines(that maybe cuz of the overweight anyway) don't mean that women will have penises and testicles and  that men will have vaginas and b*****s.

Answer 8

Personally, this isn't answering your question but I would like to be submissive to my man as It comes naturally as voice of reality said BUT not every man I meet is conferred that honour and I surpass many many men in many many areas so why the h**l would I reduce and deny myself for those men. I only get pleasure from my love in being so, I get humilation from the others....

Answer 9

But women DID wear corsets for centuries, and girdles well into the better half of the 20th century.  Not to mention, in previous centuries people didn't have the best nutrition, which kept them smaller.  And let's not forget that there's an obesity epidemic, and it's not only women who are affected by it.  What I'm trying to say is that I think there are many more likely causes for broader waistlines than extra testosterone production.