Question:

Will the vicious attack on Palin and her daughter persuade more woman to vote for her?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

Will the vicious attack on Palin and her daughter persuade more woman to vote for her?

 Tags:

   Report
Answer The Question I've Same Question Too

31 ANSWERS

Sort By: Date  |  Rating

  1. Unfortuneately yes....they gonna play the gender card so hard its gonna be sick......"Boo Hoo I'm a woman and they're picking on me"....but at the same time kicking OBAMA/BIDEN


  2. What vicious attack?  The democratic party has made it clear they will not bring the republicans party families into this ...  

  3. I see it happening already.  Women are miffed.

  4. Republicans (Rush Limbaugh) made fun of the appearance of then 12 year old Chelsea Clinton. Which attack is worse? Chelsea could not help how she looked( quite an attractive young lady), but Bristol could have kept herself from being pregnant.

  5. h**l no. First of all she is pro-life. Many of those Hillary supporters wanted Hillary because of her QUALIFICATIONS and her PRO-CHOICE. What makes you think they are going to go with a staunch Republican? Needless to say, thats the only reason why McCain picked her so that the women can vote for her. WRONG IDEA!

    To me that sounds like you are trying to do all you can to win the election...that doesn't sound like "country first!"

  6. No. Women wouldn't vote for someone just because they felt sorry for them. I'm from the UK but American election politics seem to have a distinct lack of policies, but a lot of fanfare about who is the best candidate. In the UK it would be based on policies rather than how charismatic the candidates are. I don't think our politicians are as heavily scrutinised in their personal life as yours are. And the only thing voters seem to care about is the candidate's stance on abortion. Why??

  7. I can only speak for myself,. I have been leaning toward McCain, but not for sure. After reading the viciousness and complete ignorance from many of the Democrat posters, I have firmly decided to vote for McCain. I don't want to belong to a party that kicks people when they are down and quite frankly I see them as mean and immature.

  8. I'm not attacking her daughter. Mistakes happen, teenagers have s*x. So what?

    I'm attacking Palin.


  9. No.  Why would you vote for someone just because they are under scrutiny??  Does that somehow make them qualified?  

  10. I would never vote for McCain either way. And I especially wouldn't vote for someone that I feel sorry for. I find it humorous though that Palin wants schools to teach abstinence only, when she can't even teach it to her own daughter. It is just unrealistic in society today. She is just being naive. Kids should be taught how to prevent pregnancy not that they shouldn't have s*x because what teenager is going to listen to that anyways?  

  11. Definitely, it shows just how nasty the left is, if she had elected to have an abortion, they would be celebrating her, infantacide is their thing.

  12. Those that remember Hillary being forced to apologize to Mrs. Bush will vote for McCain but mainly because Obama called all Hillary supporters "uneducated and racist" which pissed off a lot of women not to mention men.  People aren't voting for her, they are voting for McCain, she is his pick for VP.

    McCain IS our new president.

  13. I think so since women can relate to her. now the liberals are attacking her because she loves Jesus. This is so funny.

  14. No.  Women and people of reason will come to understand that Sarah Palin used very poor judgment by accepting McCains VP Offer at a time when her family is in crisis.

    She just gave birth to an infant with special needs AND her eldest daughter is a pregnant teenage girl

    For her to put her career in front of the obvious needs of her family shows to be irresponsible at the very least.  It is also possible the Sarah Palin has gotten caught up in her own vanity (posing for Vogue and being "the hottest Governor in the coldest state") that she has lost touch with reality.

    AKA - Narcissism.

  15. no i wouldn't vote for that conservative 72 year old and palin if my life depended on it.

  16. The 'attacks' are not vicious. They are deserved for someone who is such a staunch advocate of 'absitanance only' teaching. Many of these attacks are being lobbed by women themselves... So your answers is a resounding no. It may actually lose her some support, as it becomes clear she has put her family second behind her political ambitions. Unlike a guy like Biden who almost refused to take his first term in office while his family underwent crisis.. until he was convinced by a friend to take the oath and fulfill his obligation to the people that elected him. This is a man that truly put family first and you won't have to look hard on either isle in Washington to find someone who will tell you just that.  

  17. No. The truth is palin claims to be a "family values" candidate and yet her unwed, teenage daughter turns up pregnant.

    Why is the TRUTH considered "vicious" by conservative republicans?

  18. I do not believe that there was any vicious attack on Palin and her daughter,can you imagine if the shoe was on the other foot and Obama's daughter was pregnant, the Media and the Republicans would have had a field day with that information,pregnancy is not only for poor misguided females but for all young women who do not protect themselves when being intimate,voting choices is not usually made because a candidate was viciously attacked by another party or

    persons, but by who is considered to be the stronger opponent in the field of politics.

  19. Not at all.

    I think she may be a good Gov., but her views are so 1920's.  No woman with any sense of equality will want to vote for someone so conservative.


  20. Have no respect for Sarah Palin whatsoever!! What century is she living in making her daughter get married at 17 because she's pregnant?! That's disgraceful and never in a million years would I vote for such a conservative, closed-minded waste of space.  

  21. No.

    Women aren't that stupid so please give them more credit than thinking that they're going to vote for a woman simply because her daughter chose to disobey her parents.

    But Sarah's daughter being pregnant does shine the spotlight on a serious issue in this country.

    Teen Pregnancy.

    McCain has fought against teen pregnancy programs his entire time in the Senate.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/02...

    And Sarah herself is running on a platform of abstinence rather than s*x education. And her daughter being pregnant shows that simply pushing an agenda of abstinence does not work.

    So how can she expect to sell that concept to a nation when clearly it hasn't worked in her own household?

  22. I doubt it.

    Any Clinton voters that looks at Palin's record and stance on women's issues for more than 30 seconds shouldn't vote for her.

  23. The attack is on Palin's abstinence only education stance.  Few women will vote for a woman who wants the same reproductive freedoms for female as the Taliban does.

  24. Not me.  Maybe she should re-think her "abstinence only" s*x education position.  Seems like her daughter could have used it....

  25. If attacking hypocrisy is bad, then I don't know what the world is coming to.

  26. No, they knew people were going to find out anyway...so I dont even know why it wasnt mentioned in the first place. When being in the public eye you have to air out your dirty laundry before everybody else does...thats why it;s hard to get dirt on Obama...he was smart enough to let people know about it himself...only dirt people have on him is that he has a funny name...not his fault though

  27. not intelligent women who made it a goal to always be open about s*x with their daughters, if my daughter had a steady boyfriend or any boyfriend at all i would have discussed birth control options with her, and let her know i was there for her, id rather be safe than sorry, and no i would not condone my child having s*x but i would make sure she was protected, we have all been 17!

  28. No. Her daughter was old enough to know what she was doing.

    No sympathy here.

  29. Doubtful. Political loyalties trump gender. It does however show the hypocrisy of some as the same people who are attacking on some presumption of a violation of family values would be supporting a Democrat faced with the same circumstances. The better question would be will it lose her any votes. The answer is again doubtful as the Palin family is embracing responsibility in the face of the problems.  

  30. No.  Palin wants to curtail the choices women in her daughter's position will have in the future.

  31. It really is a tasteless approach to try and downcast a politician because of the situations of her family's personal lives...there should be more focus on the actual agendas, political views/standpoints, professional backgrounds and experiences...but the media machine chews on (nam, nam, nam)...

You're reading: Will the vicious attack on Palin and her daughter persuade more woman to vote for her?

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 31 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.
Register Now