Wimbledon Sleepers?

Question

So, anyone besides federer, nadal, or djokovic winning this? Who else you think has a shot?

Answer 1

Besides the three (who are completely in their own level), it would be Gasquet and Baghdatis who have a shot at winning Wimbledon.  That's it.  Nobody seems even close to winning Wimbledon as much as the big three.  Maybe we could discuss  possible surprises to make the semifinals.

Answer 2

I think Ancic and Baghdatis have a shot if their game can get back to their top performance.  Ancic is still the only man to beat Federer on grass in the last 5 years and has an Ivanisevic style of play, but so far lacks consistency.  As for Baghdatis, he has enough game, but it is too explosive so far.  He also needs to find that consistency.  But both are dangerous dark horses in my opinion.

Answer 3

Only two, realistically speaking. Roddick, who believes he has a great shot with Roger cooling off from his hot 4 year streak at the top of the tennis world. Roddick just needs to get that swagger going with his booming serves. And Nalbandian if he takes that magic potion which makes him play like a maniac. When Nalbandian gets into that zone (and I don't still know when and how), he is untouchable. He scorched Federer and Nadal after the US Open last year as though they were college athletes. There was a collective sigh of relief from the top 8 that Nalbandian did not qualify for the Master's Cup or he would have steamrolled everyone in China. But I still like the big 3, Nadal, Djokovic and Federer, in that order, to win it this year.

Answer 4

Gasquet, Murray, Roddick, Davydenko, Wawrinka, Nalbandian, Hewitt, & Berdych should be fun to watch and any one of them if they are in the zone playing out of their mind can pull an upset like Fish proved at IW.