Women: Is this a fitting punishment?

Question

A friend who studies such matters recently told me of an incident that happened several decades ago. A man, who had a history since adolescence of molesting, raping, and torturing little girls, was the focus of revenge by two sisters, one of whom had a 5 year old daughter who was repeatedly raped and tortured by the man.

In addition to other acts, the women covered his erect p***s with honey or cheese or something, and his p***s was then inserted into a cage of hungry rats. The rats then proceeded to slowly eat the man's p***s.

Now, I don't for a second condone vigilante justice, nor do I think that such barbaric methods be incorporated into any justice system.

I simply want to know what other women think. Is this a fitting punishment for a man who raped and tortured several little girls?

Answer 1

That's the first I've heard of it. However on a lighter note, I think Pina-Butter would be a cool name for a rock band!

Answer 2

If this story is true, castration should have taken place legally when and if sound witness and proof was available.  The man was using his p***s to harm people and that is not what a man's p***s is for altho that is what he decided to do with it vs accepting law and peaceful living.   If the law was doing their jobs, the man would have been behind bars.  It really doesn't matter if he understood or not.  He obviously needed to be in a controlled environment and then IF rehab is possible it should be attempted.  However, rehab has never worked because the bottom line issue isn't related.  Therapists do not have any proof of background or family concerning anyone so therefore family excuse is what the person sees or seeks as an excuse to continue whether in his own mind or something the therapist missed, did not know, or even suggested(open mouth and insert foot).

Answer 3

Emily_Jane76, no question but that you are obviously obsessed with this subject. You have asked this same question before. The first time you stated that your "little story" happened in the 1970s. The truth of the matter is that this "little story" (with which you are so morbidly fascinated) has been around since at least the ninetheenth century. It has circulated in Irish circles and Italian-American circles that i know about. It is at best an urban legend and at worst outrightly fictitious bullshit. This story has been told many times in various versions. When i first heard it in Boston, their version was that the penile spread of choice was "peanut butter (you know: 'pena butter')". It was not actually done, but was a threat made against a pervert loitering in the North End whom the Boston DA did not see fit to prosecute around 1960. The threat was effective. The pervert left the area and never returned. There was another similar story which I heard in NYC, this time with maple syrup, instead of honey or "Pena butter" cast in the role of "star spread of choice". This story has also surfaced during clinical lectures in psychoanalytic seminars because it serves as a good exemplar of psychopathic (aka "sociopathic") personality disorder.

Answer 4

That really depends, was the guy mentally ill? If so then you have to ask if he really knew what he was doing? If the guy was sane then as disturbing as the punishment is (I'm a guy and that makes me cringe) he probably got what was comming to him. You mentioned he went to a mental institution, if he didn't know what he was doing, as wrong as it is, it isn't right to torture someone who isn't functioning mentally. Prison definetly, but torture? I'm not so sure.