Women want a woman to win so badly, they are willing to lose it all, right or wrong?

Question

Women want a woman to win so badly, they are willing to lose it all, right or wrong?

Answer 1

It annoys me when women vote for Hillary just because she's a woman.

Answer 2

Wrong.

The vast majority of women are opting for choosing the person they consider the best candidate, regardless of s*x.

In contrast, I think many men vote against her just because she is a woman. I gather that from the constant stream of negative male commentary and opposition ever since she started.  I don't think I've read a single comment from a male that addresses any policy - it's all mindless hatred along the lines of her not being feminine enough; being a ****** and too aggressive and so on.

Between women voting on the basis of merit; in keeping with a feminist ethos, and men voting no just because of her s*x; we are all destined to wait out yet another presidential tenure while hoping that another female will follow in her footsteps and have a go.

Answer 3

i think SHE wants to win so badly that she is willing to destroy the democratic party just so that she can be president. that is precisely why she's not a good candidate.

Answer 4

*Correction:  Women want the BEST CANDIDATE to win so badly.  It just so happens that the best candidate is a woman.

Answer 5

Correct. A part of that "willing to lose it all" mentality is not understanding that there are rules to be followed, punishment when they aren't and fair play. How many times have you seen a female try to "change the rules" in the middle of a game, contest etc simply because she is losing? They say,"I don't like this game". No one likes to lose but a woman can NEVER lose with grace and dignity.

Answer 6

Right.

This nomination process went exactly how I thought it would.

Admittedly, longer than I thought...

...But I knew Clinton would self-implode once people really got to know her and her Chameleon ways.

Women are only enamored with her because she is a woman.  If she were Hank Clinton, they wouldn't have anywhere near the passion they have for Hillary.

When she began cheap-shotting Obama and behaving like a Republican, people realized she'd put her own self-interests in front of her party's interests and that's when the noose tightened around her neck.

As a result, McCain and company have the ability to use Clinton's slamming of Obama against him now and reference the fact that even fellow Democrats have issues with him.

For a supposedly "experienced" person, that behavior is irresponsible and "amateurish."

With her husband, daughter, and other attack dogs like Carville stumping for her, you'd think she'd be ahead if she was the "better" candidate.

The fact that she's behind speaks volumes about the real Hilary Clinton.

Answer 7

sweety...you should strain your eyes next time u look at the stats

it aint 95% of women that are for hillary...but of course if i say which candidate has 95% of a particular groups backing...i'll be labeled a racist...

whatevah...i's a metro chick and dont give a flyin f*** what indoctrinated bum f***ed egypt sheep say about me

have a good one

Answer 8

I don't buy into the "you should vote for Hillary because she's a woman just like you" thing any more than you do.  Under that logic, I should vote for Phyllis Schlafly because she's a woman.  I'm not voting for either of them.

Answer 9

Nope, that's not true. We chose wisely and we women aren't like that.

Answer 10

Incorrect. If women were that desperate to see any woman in office, Obama would be losing right now. We have standards, you know.

Answer 11

If women wanted a woman to win so badly they were willing to look the other way for all the other things...Hillary would have no problem wrapping this up.  It would be an open shut case...no point in voting.

The women arnt standing behind her....

Answer 12

Don't blame women for how she's acting.

Answer 13

i just feel that she's trying to destroy the democratic party

if sides were reversed Obama would have dropped out already