Question:

World?????

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

do you care about the world?

do you care about global warming?

 Tags:

   Report

12 ANSWERS


  1. Global warming is a sham that is causing more harm to the world I care about.


  2. Be sure to read the questions at the end!!

    >

    >

    >

    >

    > -----

    >

    >

    > Into the wild green yonder

    >

    >

    > May 11, 2008

    >

    > By Walter E. Williams - Now that another Earth Day has come and gone,

    > let's look at some environmentalists' predictions they would prefer we

    > forget.

    >

    > At the first Earth Day celebration, in 1969, environmentalist Nigel

    > Calder warned, "The threat of a new ice age must now stand alongside

    > nuclear war as a likely source of wholesale death and misery for

    > mankind." C.C. Wallen of the World Meteorological Organization said,

    > "The cooling since 1940 has been large enough and

    consistent enough

    > that it will not soon be reversed."

    >

    > In 1968, Professor Paul Ehrlich, former Vice President Al Gore's hero

    > and mentor, predicted a major food shortage in the U.S. and "in the

    > 1970s... hundreds of millions of people are going to starve to death."

    > Mr. Ehrlich forecast 65 million Americans would die of starvation

    > between 1980 and 1989, and by 1999 the U.S. population would have

    > declined to 22.6 million. Mr. Ehrlich's predictions about England were

    > gloomier: "If I were a gambler, I would take even money that England

    > will not exist in the year 2000."

    >

    > In 1972, a report for the Club of Rome warned the world would run out

    > of gold by 1981, mercury and silver by 1985, tin by 1987 and

    > petroleum, copper, lead and natural gas by 1992.

    >

    > Gordon Taylor, in his 1970 book "The Doomsday Book," said

    Americans

    > were using 50 percent of the world's resources and "by 2000 they

    > [Americans] will, if permitted, be using all of them."

    >

    > In 1975, the Environmental Fund took out full-page ads warning, "The

    > World as we know it will likely be ruined by the year 2000."

    >

    > Harvard University biologist George Wald in 1970 warned, "civilization

    > will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken

    > against problems facing mankind." That was the same year Sen. Gaylord

    > Nelson warned, in Look Magazine, that by 1995 "somewhere between 75

    > and 85 percent of all the species of living animals will be extinct."

    >

    > It's not just latter-day doomsayers who have been wrong; doomsayers

    > have always been wrong. In 1885, the U.S. Geological Survey announced

    > there was "little or no chance" of oil being discovered in California,

    >

    and a few years later they said the same about Kansas and Texas. In

    > 1939, the U.S. Interior Department said American oil supplies would

    > last only another 13 years. In 1949, the interior secretary said the

    > end of U.S. oil supplies was in sight.

    >

    > Having learned nothing from its earlier erroneous claims, in 1974 the

    > U.S. Geological Survey advised us that the U.S. had only a 10-year

    > supply of natural gas. In fact,, according to the American Gas

    > Association, there's a 1,000- to 2,500-year supply.

    >

    > Here are my questions: In 1970, when environmentalists were making

    > predictions of manmade global cooling and the threat of an ice age and

    > millions of Americans starving to death, what kind of government

    > policy should we have undertaken to prevent such a calamity?

    >

    > When Mr. Ehrlich predicted England would not exist in the

    year 2000,

    > what steps should the British Parliament have taken in 1970 to prevent

    > such a dire outcome? In 1939, when the Interior Department warned we

    > only had oil supplies for another 13 years, what actions should

    > President Roosevelt have taken? Finally, what makes us think

    > environmental alarmism is any more correct now the tune has been

    > switched to manmade global warming?

    >

    > Here are a few facts: More than 95 percent of the greenhouse effect is

    > the result of water vapor in Earth's atmosphere. Without the

    > greenhouse effect, Earth's average temperature would be zero degrees

    > Fahrenheit. Most climate change is due to the orbital eccentricities

    > of Earth and variations in the sun's output. On top of that, natural

    > wetlands produce more greenhouse gas contributions annually than all

    > human sources combined.

    >

    > Walter

    E. Williams is a nationally syndicated columnist and a

    > professor of economics at George Mason University.

  3. Yes! I do! With great power comes great responsibility and therefore I care about the world and slowing down global warming until we find a solution to it.

  4. Yes I do. Cause this is the world that God created.He made this world so beautful but human destroy it for their benifit.Eventhough I care about the global warning but what can I do.NOthing!Cause Iam just a drop of water in the sea.

    Very nice cause you also care about the world.

    Have a nice life!

  5. I care about the amount of people in the UK getting stabbed to death )-:

  6. I only care about PIES

  7. * There is no "scientific consensus" on global warming

    * Climate is always changing – with or without man

    * The Medieval Warm Period was significantly warmer than temperatures today – and was a golden age for agriculture, innovation, and lifespan

    * Most of Antarctica is actually getting colder

    * Hurricanes are not getting worse – our tendency to build houses in their path is getting greater

    * Many big businesses lobby for global warming policies that will increase their profits – and our costs

    * The media only recently abandoned the "global cooling" scare

    * The real agenda behind the "global warming" scare? A massive expansion of government control over the economy and our lives

  8. Global Warming is propaganda so you'll start buying all this "energy efficient" c**p just to make yourself feel good.

  9. Be sure to read the questions at the end!!

    >

    >  

    >

    >  

    > -----

    >  

    >  

    > Into the wild green yonder

    >

    >

    > May 11, 2008

    >

    > By Walter E. Williams - Now that another Earth Day has come and gone,

    > let's look at some environmentalists' predictions they would prefer we

    > forget.

    >

    > At the first Earth Day celebration, in 1969, environmentalist Nigel

    > Calder warned, "The threat of a new ice age must now stand alongside

    > nuclear war as a likely source of wholesale death and misery for

    > mankind." C.C. Wallen of the World Meteorological Organization said,

    > "The cooling since 1940 has been large enough and

    consistent enough

    > that it will not soon be reversed."

    >

    > In 1968, Professor Paul Ehrlich, former Vice President Al Gore's hero

    > and mentor, predicted a major food shortage in the U.S. and "in the

    > 1970s... hundreds of millions of people are going to starve to death."

    > Mr. Ehrlich forecast 65 million Americans would die of starvation

    > between 1980 and 1989, and by 1999 the U.S. population would have

    > declined to 22.6 million. Mr. Ehrlich's predictions about England were

    > gloomier: "If I were a gambler, I would take even money that England

    > will not exist in the year 2000."

    >

    > In 1972, a report for the Club of Rome warned the world would run out

    > of gold by 1981, mercury and silver by 1985, tin by 1987 and

    > petroleum, copper, lead and natural gas by 1992.

    >

    > Gordon Taylor, in his 1970 book "The Doomsday Book," said

    Americans

    > were using 50 percent of the world's resources and "by 2000 they

    > [Americans] will, if permitted, be using all of them."

    >

    > In 1975, the Environmental Fund took out full-page ads warning, "The

    > World as we know it will likely be ruined by the year 2000."

    >

    > Harvard University biologist George Wald in 1970 warned, "civilization

    > will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken

    > against problems facing mankind." That was the same year Sen. Gaylord

    > Nelson warned, in Look Magazine, that by 1995 "somewhere between 75

    > and 85 percent of all the species of living animals will be extinct."

    >

    > It's not just latter-day doomsayers who have been wrong; doomsayers

    > have always been wrong. In 1885, the U.S. Geological Survey announced

    > there was "little or no chance" of oil being discovered in California,

    >

    and a few years later they said the same about Kansas and Texas. In

    > 1939, the U.S. Interior Department said American oil supplies would

    > last only another 13 years. In 1949, the interior secretary said the

    > end of U.S. oil supplies was in sight.

    >

    > Having learned nothing from its earlier erroneous claims, in 1974 the

    > U.S. Geological Survey advised us that the U.S. had only a 10-year

    > supply of natural gas. In fact,, according to the American Gas

    > Association, there's a 1,000- to 2,500-year supply.

    >

    > Here are my questions: In 1970, when environmentalists were making

    > predictions of manmade global cooling and the threat of an ice age and

    > millions of Americans starving to death, what kind of government

    > policy should we have undertaken to prevent such a calamity?

    >

    > When Mr. Ehrlich predicted England would not exist in the

    year 2000,

    > what steps should the British Parliament have taken in 1970 to prevent

    > such a dire outcome? In 1939, when the Interior Department warned we

    > only had oil supplies for another 13 years, what actions should

    > President Roosevelt have taken? Finally, what makes us think

    > environmental alarmism is any more correct now the tune has been

    > switched to manmade global warming?

    >

    > Here are a few facts: More than 95 percent of the greenhouse effect is

    > the result of water vapor in Earth's atmosphere. Without the

    > greenhouse effect, Earth's average temperature would be zero degrees

    > Fahrenheit. Most climate change is due to the orbital eccentricities

    > of Earth and variations in the sun's output. On top of that, natural

    > wetlands produce more greenhouse gas contributions annually than all

    > human sources combined.

    >

    > Walter

    E. Williams is a nationally syndicated columnist and a

    > professor of economics at George Mason University.

    >

  10. One can care, even after reading the usual dribble of skeptics who see some conspiracy to sell light bulbs.  Facts are what each of us make of them. Our weather or climate, is most definitely undergoing changes, serious ones that sooner than later, will be undeniable by the hardest die hard.

    Problem is, it's NATURAL and part of an earth cycle, which "may" have been pushed along faster by man.

    Nothing anybody, or any country(s) can do that will reverse it. The Governments already know this, but that's a different story. We've had 10,000 years of stable weather and balanced environment, that's soon to end.

    Sit back, relax and enjoy the fantastic display of power & fury mother nature is about to put on.

  11. of course i do... it's our planet... our home...

  12. I CARE ABOUT BOTH AND IF YOUR INTERESTED IN FINDING OUT CLICK ON THIS LINK AND IT WILL SHOW YOU HOW TO START TO DELETE GLOBAL WARMING.  http://www.inventube.com/ooojay/  THIS HOW MUCH I CARE.
You're reading: World?????

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 12 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.
Unanswered Questions