Question:

Would MJ lose by 39 points (like what Kobe did against the Celtics) in the Finals?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

good job, Kobe.

 Tags:

   Report

14 ANSWERS


  1. if MJ had Pippen than he wouldn't.. because pippen carried him

    but if he didn't have pippen then he would probably lose by 69 points, and blow a 48 point lead.. if u trade mj for kobe they'd lose twice the amount.. because MJ doesn't have pippen

    jordan-pippen=4 first round exits

    kobe-shaq=finals

    pippen-jordan=game 7 wcf

    russell>kobe>pippen>jordan

    ur right he didnt have shaq or gasol.. he had big z, gibson, drew gooden, larry hughes, etc.. if he didnt have gibson he wouldnt have beaten detroit.. if u want a guy who got to the finals with hardly any help thats thats iverson..

    o ya and kobe beat the same spurs in 5 games.. that makes kobe>lechoke

    again you are wrong, manu ginobli even stated himself that the ankle was not the problem, quit using that as an excuse. as for the barry thing, referees make mistakes, they're human just like us. we all make mistakes.. if you say kobe couldnt do anything 2 years ago.. how come jordan could not do anything until pippen came along? jordan is garbage trash facing first round exit after first round exits, pippen came then it all changed.


  2. MJ competed with a watered down talent pool, so this is an unfair question.

  3. Wud u put the past behind u? GIve it a break.

  4. How come I don't remember losing?

    Must be all those shots..

    Think Happy Thoughts!

  5. Well since it never did happen to Jordan then I will of course say no, because it has never happened to him, and it never will.

    To X-Factor

    A rested Spurs team would be reigning champs as we speak, and that series was closer than most people like to believe only because it only ended in 5 games, and they would of beaten Boston, not lose to them like L.A. did.

  6. NO WAY!

  7. I agree.  Here's proof.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWGxDBChA...

  8. Not w/ pippen 2

  9. a polite respectful fan, you have your facts wrong!  its 0-1 w/ shaq and payton, 0-1 w/ gasol and odom.

    oh and no jordan wouldve won in 6, jordan doesnt goto game 7s in the finals.

  10. lol

  11. I agree that with MJ as a leader that would never ever happen on the big stage.  

    I also agree that the Spur team that beat Cavs is not the same Spur team that lost to Lakers.  Beside they only had less then a day rest between the series because of airplane problem.  They almost pull it off too.

    Could you imagine what a rested Spur team could have done?

    Maverick, maybe you could be right but we'll never know.  I agree that Spurs against Celtics would have been more entertaining and a lot closer.

  12. Your're about two months behind in this question.

  13. absolutely not. in Game 6, Kobe showed that he is a terrible leader and an even worse teammate... he quit before half time was over!! Kobe still isn't good enough to be considered even as a "MJ wannabe". and also, MJ would never blow a 24-pt lead in the 3rd quarter of a Finals game (Kobe did that in Game 4 against the Celtics).

    MJ: 6-0 in the Finals, 6 Finals MVP

    Kobe: 0-1 without Shaq, 0 Finals MVP

  14. no, mj would never give in. kobe has been my favorite player for a while, but this time, i have to hand it to the celtics, cuz they sorta owned kobe big time. i live in boston, and didnt bother rooting to the celts until they got KG and Ray Allen. Now there back on top. Boston forever!

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 14 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.
Unanswered Questions