Would You Wrap Fish With The New York Times?

Question

The New York Times has done a great favor to the McCain Campaign!

He has raised 6 million dollars within 36 hours of their totally unfounded, unsubstantiated "Smear" story about an "inappropriate relationship" with a Washington Lobbyist!

Even to the "unuinformed" voting public it's now patently obvious that The New York Times is purely Ultra Liberal, biased, unprofessional and corrupt.

The NY Times focus is to get a Left Wing Democrat in the White House. Their journaluism is all about that and resembles Fasist propaganda! Dr. Goebbels would be proud!

With Dump Truck loads of damning scandals about Hillary Clinton gone unexamined and an incredible amount of damning behavior festering about Barak "Hussein" Obama, the NY Times is strangely silent.

Sadly, there is no oversight for Journalists or the Print Media.

But the story back-fired.

Conservatives are rallying, and money is pouring in for McCain!

Will the Far Left Wing Liberals ever learn?

What say you?

2 seconds ago - 3 days left to answer.

Answer 1

I wouldn't even wipe my butt with that liberal rag.

Answer 2

no, I would not wrap fish in it. I don't want that c**p on something that I might eat

Answer 3

As long as the print didn't come off

Answer 4

I'd only wrap the fish with that rag, if I wanted said fishies to smell even worse than they already do!

Answer 5

no it would spoil the fish

Answer 6

For some good fish and chips and Manhatten????? h**l Yes!!!

Answer 7

What say I?  Not much, because I have never had much regard for the NYT anyway.

More important, what say Lehrer News Hour analysts Mark Shields (liberal) and David Brooks (moderately conservative)?  They agreed that the NYT did a pretty rotten job of reporting and that John McCain and his people quickly put the "news" right where it belongs, in the garbage can.

Answer 8

In their defense, and in defense of any news organization, they report stories they authenticate from human sources.  If disgruntled campaign workers decide they want to damage a candidate, it only takes one with a filthy mind to make an allegation and one more to confirm it.  The New York Times wants to sell newspapers and people love to read dirt.

Relative to the media being liberal, I'm liberal and the media has seemed disgustingly supportive to the conservatives over the last 8 years.  Maybe if they'd been doing their jobs before the Iraq War and exposed the faulty intelligence, the publice wouldn't have supported the war and we'd have a lot fewer dead service men and women.

These days the media is about making a profit and nothing more.

Answer 9

before the conservatives get all warmies over the c**p the NYTs pulled. Rush and his buddies also threw thier considerally large blowhard yappers against McCain..

Answer 10

Why would I want to ruin my fish by doing that?

Answer 11

NY Times: the preferred toiletry of bums nationwide

Answer 12

I co-sign all the 'what did the poor fish do to deserve such

treatment?' comments.

I heard the story on the car radio first and went home to make

a donation via Senator McCain's web site.  It wasn't much,

but apparently I wasn't the only one to think he needed a show

of support!

Answer 13

I wouldn't want to ruin the fish.

Answer 14

Nope, it would make the fish taste bitter. They sure misjudged on the reaction of the people on this little bit of political dirty pool.