well stocked with "slackers" of good character.
The reasoning being that a "slacker" of poor character joining or being in the section would pose unacceptable risk.
"Good slackers" would tend to shield their work colleagues from likely harm from the slacker of poor character.
The reason why the slacker of poor character poses such a risk is that co-workers aren't really authorised to order the slacker back to work. (And if it's safety-critical software, you wouldn't want the slacker to be doing anything). Co-workers want to do the scheduled work so will cover for the slacker. The slacker of poor character will likely want to oust immediate boss if possible, spread rumours, indulge in a bit of character assassination and back-stabbing.
Tags: