Would a Nuclear Winter Counteract Global Warming? (If GW were true.....)?

Question

Lets say, that if global warmimg was true, (if it wasnt a load of **** being fed to us from that idiot Al Gore) Would a Nuclear Winter Counteract it? Haha just a random question!

Answer 1

It wouldn't make a h**l of a lot of difference to us and what we now refer-to as future generations.

And, incidentally, even our lamo president now acknowledges the threat of global warming-if only under the verbal disguise of "climate change'.

Follow the news.  SNOW in Jerusalem? !

Answer 2

Haha!

I totally agree with your point of view that Al Gore is a scumbag making c**p up....

But to answer your question, I doubt it.

Answer 3

yes - both short term and long term - since the population of humans would be dramatically reduced and civilization would be set back hundreds of years. On the downside the entire northern hemisphere would be uninhabitable for quite some time and it would alter the path of evolution with far more mutations occurring in organisms from all the fallout.

this has seemed to become a favorite question among deniers - strange people you are.

Answer 4

I have a new myspace headline.

;)

carry on the fight for denial dude.

Answer 5

HEY LETS GO NUKE EACH OTHER, THAT SOUNDS FUN!

Answer 6

Oooooo...bad idea. You would get too many unknown changes. Cold where you don't want it.  Drought in some places and too much rain in others. Damage to crops from the reduced sunlight. less evaporation less rainfall due to droplets sticking to too many particles. Not to mention the nuclear fallout and that global warming is not as harmful as those really cool TV shows portray.

Answer 7

Not true - a few hundred nukes might depopulate 10 - 20%  of earth.  But that would have little/no effect on the earth's climate.

However several hundred thousand undersea volcanoes could easily effect earth's climate as well as pump out large amounts of CO2:

Three million underwater volcanoes:

http://www.iceagenow.com/Three_Million_U...

http://environment.newscientist.com/arti...

AGW Fans (fanitics) will never concede the effects of the Sun's other emissions or Undersea Volcanoes  and the power of the Sun's electromagnetic emissions controlling the Earth's Magma flow causing volcanic venting.

Scientists are just now learning the extent and power of undersea volcanoes.

Listen to climate change:

http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian...

Answer 8

Yes, it would. Possibly not the healthiest of solutions however...

Answer 9

If it is to warm, it is GW

If it is to cold, it is GW

If there is a flood, it is GW

If there is a drought, it is GW

If an island is eroding it is GW

If the bears drown its GW

If a hurricane comes ashore its GW

Every anomaly on the planet is caused by GW, humans and CO2

Answer 10

no because nuculear winter would be on us almost instantly and global warming is only a degree or two every hundred years.