Would a lawsuit finally expose the global warming hype?

Question

Would environmentalists be better off just supporting efforts to clean the environment for health reasons and alternative energy for economic reasons?

Answer 1

I don't think a lawsuit would do any good since the coverage of it would be reported by those who are firmly enthralled by the man-made global warming hype, that is, to say, the main stream media.

Environmentalist would be better off supporting clean and healthful environmental issues and so would all of us.  However, the environmental movement has been captured by rabid America haters and all their efforts are directed not so much at environmental issues as they are to hurting the U.S.

Alternative energy is, at this stage, largely a pipe dream.  We could never build enough wind mills to supply our energy.  Ethanol is a bust.  Without Federal subsidies it is far too expensive and no one would buy it.  Presently, it is monopolizing so much crop land that food prices are on the rise and poor countries we used to feed when we had great surpluses are now starving.  Solar is a good idea for small applications but is very expensive and would require virtually all the land area in the sunshine states to produce enough electricity to power only a fraction of our needs.  In short, we're stuck with oil and coal and nuclear primarily for the foreseeable future unless there's a major unforeseen breakthrough.

Answer 2

With the words of God?

Decode this lyrics " I saw the sign"

Luke 21.33-36

Luke 21.11,25

Leviticus 26.1-41

Luke 17.26-30

What do you think?