Would an inconvient truth be less popular if Al Gore was not the narrorator/spokesman for it?

Question

For hypothetical reasons if some random person you never heard about narrorated/ presented An Inconvient Truth. would it be more popular, less popular, or whatever

give me your thoughts

Answer 1

Al Gore had to narrorat the bogus movie. Look at the cover man HE HAS THE HURRICAIN SPINNING THE WRONG WAY! they spin counterclockwise, Not clockwise! He is laughing at you! Yea It would have been less popular.

Answer 2

Well, I think the fact that he is an intelligent and highly respected politician, author, researcher and scholar lends more credence to the claims; but the information could have been narrated by anyone and it would have substantiated the common sense thinking of many people just the same.  In fact, if he hadn't narrated the film, it is possible that many Republicans would be more inclined the accept the presented material.

Answer 3

This is obvious LESS POPULAR, by far. Thousands of climate change documentaries have been made, many more informative than that one. Its solely the fact that he is a former vice president of the US and a prominent political figure of our time that gave the film credibility. It gave climate change activists a foothold in mainstream culture, because Gore is a known mainstream figure. Without a doubt.

Its not a bad thing, that someone with credibility would rocket the issue to center stage. I don't think that takes away from it at all.

Answer 4

Al Gore is so wrong, wrong, wrong.......he ought to dry up and blow away.

Answer 5

It would not make me any difference who it was. I still would ignore it