Would humanity be better off on Mars?

Question

Or should we save what we've got.

Answer 1

Mars or Venus.  If we keep this up, that's what we're going to get.  

Can someone explain to me how 6.5 billion people produce less environmental impact than 2.5 billion?

Answer 2

No, because Mars is currently too hot to live and has no water. Rather we should save what we got because we need it to sustain our lives.

Answer 3

We are saving what we have.  There's less pollution today then there was back in the 1960's.

Answer 4

Yeah it would be so cool! imprbable but cool!

Answer 5

The Earth isn't going to last forever.  Eventually we're going to have to expand into the Cosmos anyway.  We should take care of what we got, but know that it isn't permanent and therefore prepare for leaving Earth whether it be Mars or elsewhere.

Answer 6

We can't say whether there is life on Mars or not. But its better we prevent the further damage and menace to the nature. If we even find life in mars there is no guarantee that we can live there and also a common man cannot afford of the cost of probing there. Also we cannot bear extreme cold and water scarce areas.

Answer 7

no mars is dead

it has no protection to save us either.

Answer 8

They would die of boredom there. Also, there are various issues!

Answer 9

Martianity, mebbe...

Of course, we should save what we've got!