Would the United States "actually" invade Iran?

Question

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Bush administration has launched a "significant escalation" of covert operations in Iran, sending U.S. commandos to spy on the country's nuclear facilities and undermine the Islamic republic's government, journalist Seymour Hersh said Sunday.

Answer 1

The United States  most assuredly  would invade Iran,

and  all the talk about development of nuclear capabilities

has practically sealed  their doom.

It's code.  It was the code for invading Iraq,  wasn't

it?  If  crack teams are sent in to reconnoiter and come out

swearing  it's true, during this political campaign where

you have a candidate with no military  bonafides running

against one  with,  then how would the withouts dare

to question  the military's word?

That's where the rubber hits the road on whether or not

you can lead them--if you believe  what they say is true.

If you  question their best work, then you're deemed obviously

unfit to lead them.  McCain has already made his bones

there.

The demonrats will have  brought all this down on  all our heads,

however it turns out. I, for one, will only be wishing  if it does

come down to a boots-on-the-ground invasion I could be there

blowing big gaping holes in the likes of the  a$$wholes who

defiled the U.S. embassy in tehran so many years ago--students

they called 'em--just like in  Afganistan.

Well, it's time  those  students got their lessons then, isn't it?

Get the oldest age of induction into the armed services raised

to 53--petition your congressmen and senators!  I called every

branch and tried to enlist so many years ago when this all

began. I was "too old"--but by the time  I really  was getting

too old,  they'd raised the age to what I was when first refused--

when I was fit as I'd ever been.

They called themselves "students" in Afganistan.  They studied to

beat helpless women when they went out of their house

without a male escort.

Bush was riding high and had 'em all running scared when  he

announced that Iraq was trying to buy "yellow cake" from

some african pest-hole.  It was  code for "we have to secure

Iraq before we can have Iran in a position  where they're geographically isolated from easy lines of resupply  if we should find it necessary  to attack them.  At that time  I think you'll find that Libya really had been caught red-handed with a nuclear weapons fuel refinery sitting on skids and in cargo containers in  the wonderful Diversity Paradise (I notice all the fans-mandela didn't go there to celebrate him...) of  South Africa just waiting to be shipped.  Mo crumbled and sued for peace without a shot being fired, so terrible was our reputation then. But of course, up until then the demonrats had not decided to throw all  concerns for the nation to the jackals and  foist an anti-war/anti-Bush campaign as their only sound strategy for regaining lost political--POLITICAL--ground.

For, you see, that's the only kind of conquest they can even  comprehend.  If Obama wins, you better pray  that any enemy that attacks us is armed only with crooked politicians and registered corpses...

At that time, had the United States  continued to show a united front to the enemies   of   civilization,  Iran (one of the worst of those) might have been expected to  take a page from  Kadhafi's  goat-skin. They just might have coughed  up the bunch of high-ranking terrorist who ran over there from Afganistan when  the "students" there got their "ya don't p**s into the wind"  lesson.  But NO. The demon-rats just HAD to recover some political power!  They didn't care if it hare-lipped everbody on Bear Creek!

So here we are now on the eve of an election the  repugnicans are probably sore-afraid they can't win   on any other issue than whether  their candidate is ready to hit the ground running--and it will be running an actual war against actual military regulars, which is precisely what you can bet most of the guys in uniform  in Iraq and Afganistan are just dying to do--it's what they're really  trained to do--fight wars against other military organizations. I'm not saying that  they haven't been trained to deal with insurgents. The trouble is,  nobody can do that. Only other  rival insurgents can do that--you set a thief to catch a thief.  They don't play by the rules.  They don't worry about  a court-martial if they break the rules of engagement, because they're making them up as  they go along. Our guys have to worry about the rule-book, because some  shiess-kopf "embedded journalist" might take a damning picture of them shooting some guy faking like he's wounded in a moque just the day after someone doing the same thing shot him in the face and make a big stink about it to try to help the cause of  the  damned  demonrats...

Will it be bloody? You can bet it will. Those b******s will be fighting for their own land. They'll have been steeped in the lies that if we win they can expect ten times worse than they had it under Pahlavi. You'd fight like a devil if you were them and I would too. Think about your home town being invaded by foreigners--even  well intentioned ones.

And it  might have been  avoided  had those  making the  decisions in Tehran observed themselves flanked by a nation united in it's stance against  the kind of  terrorism Iran definitely has  abetted.

But they saw the handwriting on  the wall---that  the demonrats were going to exploit  the  cowardly-lion  side of the U.S. persona and re-fry   the  old hippy anti-war  bean-curd.  h**l, they had full-fledged anti-war demonstrations in full-swing before the first boots hit the ground in  Iraq.  Bush had to  tell  lies about "yellow cake" and  training  camps  with airliner fuselages  because  when you're flanking  your next  objective you don't  tell them so in the press so they can  dig-in and prepare the worst sort of reception for you in case  they're  dumber than you thought they could be and you have to actually back your threat with force.

But when they saw the demon-rats dividing our nation against itself and it's resolve to see the war on terror through to  it's  best conclusion, they weren't dumb. They were smart--who could blame them.  But they weren't smart enough, because  they didn't think  a U.S. sitting  President would start bloody war just to insure  his best  successor  would win  the  election and carry on the war--not the best it could have been, but the only way the demonrats  allowed it to be.

So yes, thanks the the very worst plague any free nation could possibly hope never to have,  demonrats,  likely what you're reading about will be a prelude to  actual bloody war that might have been a diplomatic accommodation to our (and the world's) advantage.

And to the guy who keeps talking about how  paper dollars are "c**p", please send me all your c**p-dollars. I find they  work pretty well for me.  They're still based on what all viable currencies really always have been based--the willingness  to go to war and the ability to win war. For  even if the money is based on  gold, you've got to have  that willingness and ability in order to keep the rest of the world from  walking in and just picking  what your money's based on and walking away with it.

I'm really getting sick and tired of half-baked  mental giants who think they know what they're talking about going around giving aid and comfort to dire national enemies and  being patted on the back for it.

Personally, I hope  that Dingle or whatever his name is finally gets his way and there is a military draft and they clear all the ghettos out first--get rid of them in the first wave.  Then our crime rate will rival  all the worst far-eastern tyrannies where you're not even allowed to chew chewing-gum again and  the imbeciles can stop trying to turn the Bill of Rights into some sort of legal smorgasbord.  

Gosh, not only do I know a lot more than most of the political

pundits seem to about  the current world situation, I also know more than the dolt who coded the spell-check that underlines misspelled words  as I type. smor*gas*bord !

Answer 2

Where have you been?  That is all they have talked about for months.  In my opinion, if Bush and Cheney had their way we would already be there.  Now they are trying for more sanctions.  Well, if they get their way, it will be the end of the US.  China and Russia both will bomb us.  How are we going to take on all three of them?  Iran will destroy our troops in iraq while Russia and China bomb us.  

http://www.campaigniran.org/casmii/index...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080620/ap_o...

Answer 3

Iraq was attacked to protect Israel and Iran is next, such is the power of the American Zionist lobby

Answer 4

Yep and Washington D.C. (District of Columbia) has already planned to go to war with Iran a long time ago, but NOT because they "Supossibly have Nuclear weapons, they want to control them.

It's just part of a big plan of the fed Government/Wash D.C. to take over the world and then when the feds have what they believe is ultimate power, then the "Central Bankers" (who make our Currency peice of c**p papers) will swoop in and tell the Fed's... ,"guess what, Pay up or become my Slaves". then every Human being on the face of this planet will become the Bankers Slaves.

The Fed's only want to go to war for the power, while the Central Bankers actually Profit off  of people Dieing, isn't that Wonderful?!  >:-\

Answer 5

Yes in 29 days.

Answer 6

The Zionist overlords are edging to - only public opinion can stop them and  awareness of who's really pulling the strings.

they care less about the disastrous consequences for the US and its people.

http://www.iamthewitness.com

Answer 7

Can't say for sure, but sure as h**l must be rough for Persians nowadays.

Answer 8

for sure!! with like more than 100 billion dollars for war now

Answer 9

What do you Americans call "invasion"?.

Iran is already invaded. In every country the US always threatens the US always have some military presence in there already operating there.

E.g. Somalia. We never went war with Somalia, except that ill fated operation everyone remembers, but once a while the US bombs "terrorists" in there, and yet we have no military presence in there, but we sure do have the presence and capability to attack there with in minutes. Same thing goes to every place whether it is Iran or not.

Answer 10

I hope and prey we dont..

We need nothing over there, they cant shoot the c**p about democracy anymore, look at whats happening in Africa. One presidential candidate strong armed the populace to vote for him or else.

Forget getting oil, hemp is the way of the future as far as resources go. I just hope our government see this before its too late.