Would you agree with those rankings ?

Question

I know it is only a game...

http://www.monopolyworldvote.com/en_US/world/leaders

Answer 1

Not at all.

Three of the cities are Canadian. That alone makes it a joke.

I think this list should have major cities represented, as well as show that the world is not only America, Canada, and Europe. This list does NOT do that.

New York City, London, and Tokyo are major cities, but because Tokyo is in Asia, it's been falling, and I think soon it will be off the top completely. Hong Kong is also falling, so it's very likely that Asia will not be represented, which is pathetic. Tokyo, Hong Kong, (maybe Beijing, although I think one city per nation is best), and Mumbai should be on the list from Asia for sure. I'm surprised Bangkok isn't even a choice.

Latin America should have at least one city. I'd say Buenos Aires or Rio de Janeiro, but currently, I don't think South America is going to be on the board at all.

Africa only has one option, Cape Town, so I am glad that it is on the list. I'd like to see a few more African cities, actually, but they didn't even make them options! Lagos, Addis Ababa, Mombasa... Those would have been good additions to allow voting.

Europe has too many voting options and too many cities on the list. It makes the list quite boring.

The Middle East now has Jerusalem on the list. That's kind of nice. I think Dubai and Cairo are better, though.

Yeah, it's just a silly game, but the results are heavily Eurocentric. It's going to be a disappointing mess of a board.

Answer 2

NO!!