Would you be happy if no one was rich, but no one was poor?

Question

Because that is not the idea behind capitalism, so maybe another country might be for you, i'm just saying.

Answer 1

Sure.  It's called sharing.  We learned about it in kindergarten, remember?

Answer 2

I'll let Mahatma Gandhi answer your question:

"There is enough for everyone's need, but not enough for everyone's greed."

Answer 3

No, society would have no traits.Everyone would be the same, and there would be nothing to work for. Life would turn into a puddle of nothing. The contrasts are good.

Answer 4

No, that would suck, if someone is stupid and ignorant and all they want to do is take my money, or at least have the government do it for them they deserve to be poor. Some people are better than others and it has nothing to do with race or gender.

Edit: He is being sarcastic and insulting democrats, I thought that was pretty clear

Answer 5

Sounds nice..but won't happen..unless there is such rule..anyway real meaning for rich is free of worries..free of ailments..free of fear..free of enemies..

Answer 6

That's communist ideology that has never worked.  Mainly everyone remains poor, except the people in power.  Look at Cuba.

Answer 7

How about if no one was happy and no one was sad or if no one was cold and no one was hot or if no one was black and no one was white or if no one was tall and no one was short or if no one was fat and no one was skinny  How about if we were all exactly alike and everyone got handouts from the government.

Answer 8

sounds like communism to me