Would you be pissed with your husband/boyfriend if every time you agreed with him, he said you obeyed him?

Question

mcq, always playful.

Answer 1

You have to find out where he is getting this misinformation. Point out to him that if he is using the " wives submit to your husband's speech" from St. Paul, it also says husbands submit to your wives. St Paul was writing from the idea that men were to be leaders of their families like Christ was the leader of His Church. just like that. in submission to God's will.

unfortunately most men can't or won't submit to God. point out his error, and how you will support him in helping taking the 2 X 4 out of his own eye, before he passes judgment on what you do.

I am a man darlin', and I would be a bit upset with him if i were a woman because he is twisting the gospel unto his own ends.

Answer 2

I'd tell him very politely that agreeing that the kettle is black just because he says so has got nothing at all to do with obedience.  "Sweetheart, when you tell me to do something and I do it, that means I'm obeying you; simply agreeing with you is not the same; nor does it mean the same.  I, as well as you, must be allowed my opinion so that we can communicate.  Communication is how we grow together in love and harmony.  Constantly agreeing with you will become old hat and boring; something neither one of us want and should avoid."  <all the while smiling kindly>.

Answer 3

depends on context, and the type of relationship if its D/s well that is expected lol...

Answer 4

Yes I would, that's patronizing and insulting. Unless I got to say he obeyed me when he agreed with me. Then it would just be... kind of weird.

Answer 5

It could just be the guy acting like a douchebag or trying to be sarcastic.  The bigger question, to me, is how does he react when you DISAGREE?  That would tell you if he's serious.

Answer 6

h**l yah! I'd be more than pissed! If he really believes that, you need to get rid of him now. Arrogance is not a trait to be admired nor tollerated.

Answer 7

h**l YEAH I WOULD BE PISSED!

Answer 8

I wouldn't be pissed because when the trait became apparent he'd be history. He never would have considered marriage material in the first place.

There is nothing humorous about someone who insults you and then says "I was just kidding". Because if they said it there is a grain of truth somewhere. Why would they even think it was funny, in other words.

Answer 9

He wouldn't be my husband/boyfriend.  I don't put up with immaturity and stupidity like that.  It would be a case of "bye-bye loser".

Answer 10

Agreement and obeyance are completely different.  Agreement suggests that there is thought involved, whereas obeyance suggests NO thought...

Answer 11

If he said that I wouldn't take it personally. He'd just be kidding.

Answer 12

hellz yea i would be! that kinda makes me a lil mad jus thinkin bout it lol i have an anger prob so yea it would be all kinds of fightin in my house lol da po po's would at my house lol haha

Answer 13

Such a person is obviously very insecure and is resorting to emotional bullying to boost his own confidence by diminishing his partner's.

I would never couple with a person like that.

But, if you're experiencing this, it might be fun to turn the tables -- just say the same thing to him whenever he happens to agree with you... see how he likes it!

Answer 14

I would be beyond pissed.  That would cause serious problems.

Answer 15

He once said that I was "cooperative." That's because he usually asks for my opinion when I don't even have one, so I just let him decide. I didn't think much of it. But "obey?" I wouldn't take that lightly.

Answer 16

I had a girlfriend who acted like this.  I just ignored it because I cared for her and most people have quirks.