Would you pay to keep your ancesters frozen?

Question

Let's say it's like the year 2300, and your great-great-great-great-great-great-grea... was cryogenically frozen, but it costs £/$100,000s per year to keep them preserved, when the 'responsibility' was passed onto you, would you bother or would you expel their chances of one day reviving?

Answer 1

Dead is dead; stick um in the ground.

Answer 2

If he wants to be frozen he has to pay for it.

Answer 3

No, by the time he is revived, I'll be dead and gone!

Answer 4

ELL NO!

Answer 5

That is almost like cloning...and besides if they earned it you don't want to keep them from going to heaven...and besides it wouldn't work...duh! We aren't gods you know...God id the only one who can create (or revive hundreds of years later) human beings it is just not possible.

Answer 6

Well, at present time, all of my ancestors are quite dead and gone, so I would just say: "Does not apply".