Yahoo News says that Primates are in danger of extinction; does this include Rowan Williams?

Question

Yahoo News says that Primates are in danger of extinction; does this include Rowan Williams?

Answer 1

Once again extinction does not threaten who we would love it too. Why does mother nature not go after them (cuddly) politicians. We want them to go extinct and fast.  

Answer 2

Quite possibly, but we can just hope that it includes Robbie Williams ..........

Edit.

In deference to The Archbishop of Canterbury and The Royal Commission for Political Correctness, it was announced today that the local climate in the UK should no longer be referred to as 'English Weather.'

Rather than offend a sizable portion of the population, it will now be referred to as 'Muslim Weather.'







In other words - 'partly Sunni, but mostly s**+'ite.

Answer 3

They meant Primark, there's a recession on you know.

Answer 4

Hopefully! Yes!

Answer 5

I thought Robbie Williams was the one to go?

Answer 6

Someone once asked, "who will rid me of this....priest?"

Rowan Williams and the forced issue of Sharia Law in UK

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0f_vvPUX...

Rowan Williams is unfit to be Archbishop of Canterbury.  He does little or nothing [that I know of] to support Christians and instead goes out of his way to support Muslims.

Muslims are the same people who are going to kills us all and have already made several attempts to destroy us here in London.

The bloodbath ahead. . . . .

Answer 7

Sadly yes, his beard has a tenancy to be trapped in bushes and on wire fences. This makes him easy prey for more toothy denominations.  

Answer 8

you bet ye.

Answer 9

Lol

Answer 10

LOL

Well he seems to be talking himself out of a job.It's almost like he's going to subcontract out the tiresome religion business to all the other faiths that, according to him, seem to be just as valid as his anyway.

Answer 11

well technically humans are categorized as primates so if you think humans are on the verge of extinction,  I would have to disagree.  Maybe 100 years or so and that statement would be true :)