Question:

Yes, this question is probally one of the most asked question, but is global warming real?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

yes, the world has been warming up for the past couple decades, but is it that dangerous...or are people just trying another scam or hoax for more money...isn't God the one who desides what happens?..I personally will trust Him through anything....but what are your thoughts?? Thank you for your thoughts...=)

 Tags:

   Report

10 ANSWERS


  1. God just watches as man destroys.  Keep your faith in God it's your faith in politicians that is the problem.  Yes climate change is real and it's because of pollution that it is happening at such a fast pace.  The earth will continue but our world is going to have to change if we are to survive.


  2. Are you seen "An inconvenient truth" by Al Gore ? Although some scientific facts are exaggerated, the documentary gives you a good sense of why most scientist today agree that global warming is real and caused by humans.

  3. The science says yes, some people's opinions say no.  Science is based on fact, opinions aren't.  In asking a question like this you're illiciting a lot of unfounded comments, there are several such examples above.

    Global warming is happening - partly as a natural cycle and partly because of the effects we're having on out atmosphere.  Neither are fully understood but we do know enough to confidently say that this is the case.

    As to your particular points.  The world has been warming for 18,000 years, in the last 100 years it's warmed as much as it did in the preceeding 10,000 years.

    Is it dangerous?  In many ways yes it is.  Not so much from rising sea levels and the like (we can move to avoid those) but from the things we can't avoid and are already witnessing - droughts, floods, wildfires, insect infestation, spread of disease etc.

    Is it a hoax for money?  No.  Global warming has been understood and documented by scientists since the 1800's and contrary to what may skeptics would have you beleive there isn't money to be made from studying global warming.  Research grants and salaries are paid whatever the subject is that's being studied.  If scientists wanted to make money from such a scheme they'd have focused on pharmacuticals and medical technologies where the real money lies.

    Regarding God - no comment, I'm not a religious person.

  4. In a word... NO.

    That does not mean we should be irresponsible with the evironment.

    Yes, it was a warm first part of the winter. Then it was a very cold winter. Now we are having a cool spring.

    We know the earth is wobbling... could it be that this wobble caused our winter to be "late"? It explains a lot.

    Also, there has been no warming in the southern hemisphere... so "GLOBAL" really is not true no matter how you slice it... maybe we should call in Hemisphere Warming or something.

    We have had wacky weather recently, but I think it is just a natural cycle... 30 years ago we were all going to die because of an ice age. Now we are all going to die because of Global Warming. What will be next?

    This is the new communism. The economy can be strangled with Global Warming fears, and with it, they can control what we buy, where we travel, where we work, what we eat, and lots of other really scary things.

  5. Actually, I think its a falsity made by scientists to get gov. funding. And, about An Inconvenient Truth, more than 90% of the facts in that movie have been proved false, it's mostly about Al Gore's live, and there's just a few mistakes in it. For example, Al Gore says that trees take in oxygen and release carbon dioxide and also for the graph for the temperature in the future, it curves backwards back into 1990's, which I don't understand...

  6. T-Man,

    Im a 28-year environmental scientist.  I have seen alot of crazy stuff come and go during that time; the RADON scare, the ALANON scare on apples, the LEAD PAINT scare that is claiming our children, and now GLOBAL WARMING caused by burning fossil fuels.

    I can report to you first that environmental science is only my vocation; my profession is Jesus Christ.

    I can report to you secondly, that ALL of these so-called crises have been only minorly true; and I mean a very minor portion of truth in each.

    Global warming is real, it does exist, but are we causing it?  NO!  it has happened several times in our earthly past, and will happen again...by best calculations, in about 120 years to trigger either a minor or major ice age.  Oh well!  Can we stop it?  NO.  Can we prolong its onset.....MAYBE.

  7. The theory of man-made global warming is false.  Anyone who believes otherwise has not investigated the evidence or is purposely remaining ignorant to the legitimate opposition to global warming.  I have given up an one and a half hours to watch “An Inconvenient Truth” so I ask you to do the same and watch the movie detailing the opposition.

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...  

    Another general resource: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warm...

    CO2 is not causing the globe to warm the opposite is true, the warming is increasing the atmospheric CO2.  When the world heats it gradually increases the temperature of the oceans which serve as the largest CO2 sink.  As the oceans heat up they release CO2 which is stored in them.  The information comes from the same data Al Gore uses, the temperature always goes up before the concentration of CO2 goes up.

    http://www.lavoisier.com.au/papers/artic...

    CO2 makes up only .03% of our atmosphere.  Water vapor, another greenhouse gas, makes up 1-4% of our atmosphere, this gas is acknowledged to be the main greenhouse gas.  All human activities combined contribute only 6 Gigatons of CO2 to the atmosphere each year.  Animals, through respiration, decomposition, etc contribute 150 Gigatons of CO2 to the atmosphere.  So humans contribute only a small amount of CO2 to the atmosphere which is already in very small concentrations in the atmosphere.

    http://oco.jpl.nasa.gov/science.html This is where my data came from, it is an interesting site, it displays the same graphics as Al Gore in his movie but it tells how low the human contribution is.  So Al Gore is using the same data but coming to a different conclusion, who do you want to believe a politician with no scientific training or the NASA CO2 laboratory, a group of scientists who spend their entire careers studying CO2.

    We know the greenhouse effect is real it is a necessary effect to keep our planet at a habitable temperature.  However if our current warming is due to greenhouse gasses it would cause warming in the troposphere , but the troposphere is actually getting cooler.

    http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/temperature... That points to other explanations to our current warming.

    So what is causing our current warming, it is the sun.

    http://web.dmi.dk/solar-terrestrial/spac...

    http://www.aip.org/enews/physnews/2003/s...

    http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/06...

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/200...

    http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2003/...

    The fact that only the earth’s surface is warming points to direct heating from the sun rather than heating due to greenhouse gasses.  Also other planets in our solar system are warming pointing to a common cause of warming, that common cause being the sun.

    http://www.livescience.com/environment/0...

    http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/...

    http://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/sola...

    http://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/sola...

    The global warming crowd says our glaciers are melting and animals will suffer this is another false claim.

    http://www.co2science.org/scripts/CO2Sci...

    http://www.nationalcenter.org/NPA235.htm...

    http://www.worldclimatereport.com/

    the global warming crowd also claims a scientific consensus on the issue, this is wrong in two ways.  One, there is no consensus, this is a false claim to make you believe in global warming by suppressing the opposition.  http://www.oism.org/pproject/s33p36.htm

    Second, even if there was a consensus it would mean nothing, science is not politics, you don’t vote on theories to determine their legitimacy.

    The IPCC is the main supporter of global warming, their statements are defended blindly by people who don’t want to admit that global warming is not real.  People will claim that they took into account natural sources of CO2, they didn’t.  Take a look for yourself:

    http://www.ipcc.ch/activity/srccs/index....  That is the latest IPCC report, read the entire report, do a search of the documents, there is absolutely no mention of natural sources of CO2.  The natural sources have been completely ignored.  Also people will claim that the IPCC took the sun into account in their report, this is not entirely correct, while the sun is mentioned the report it’s effects have not been accurately represented.

    http://www.john-daly.com/forcing/moderr....  The IPCC did not take into account the Svensmark factor.  This would greatly reduce the effect of solar radiation on the earth.  Look back up to the solar resources to see the effect of the sun correctly represented.

    Also allegations have been by IPCC scientists who disagreed with the IPCC statements.  They say that their research was censored or taken out of the IPCC report.  This is not the first time the IPCC has lied, they forged the famous “hockey stick” graph, which later resulted in a reissuing of the IPCC report.

    Quotes form politicians, CEO’s, and others are not proof of global warming, they issue these statements to get votes and customers.  Scientists are able to get published and get time on the media by supporting global warming.  The IPCC continually lies and misrepresents data so they keep their jobs.  

    In regards to the precautionary principle that says we can only help if we switch over to alternative energy, this idea is not correct.  While this may seem legitimate it only helps the first world, third world countries can not afford to switch to the more expensive energy options.  Also the US currently spends 4 billion dollars a year on global warming research which could be better spent on research for disease or to fight poverty.  For an excellent example of how the precautionary principle is harmful you do not need to look further than DDT.  This pesticide was cheap and incredibly effective but it was banned because of it harmful effects on egg shells.  Now thousands of people die every year in third world countries because of malaria, a disease that could be easily controlled with DDT.

    I hope anyone who believes in global warming they will take a look at the resources I provided.  These resources should convince you that global warming is not man-made, it is caused by cycles in the earths climate.  If you are not convinced I hope you at least take a new look at global warming as an unproven idea.  Remember that global warming is big business for anyone who aligns themselves with it.

    I could not go this entire post without mentioning global cooling.  In the 1970’s it was claimed that there was a consensus on the fact that the world was headed into an ice age.  We have seen once before how damaging a false claim about our climate change can be to our world.  Most of the global warming crowd does not want you to know about this scare because it is so similar to the scare today.  Government panels were formed and claimed the world was headed to an ice age, evidence poured in supporting the claim, a consensus was claimed, then the whole issue just faded away.  That is what will happen with the false scare of global warming.

  8. if it  is the E P A is the one causing Global warming. It has long been understood what caused the ice age was volcanic smoke in the air which filtered out the sun light and made things cooler. So alongs comes The E P A and puts in a no burn ban and takes out what smoke that there was in the air letting in more sun light which is making things hotter, and to compound the problem the things which should have been burned is now rotting and giving off methane gas which causes more global warming

  9. Global warming is real and mostly caused by us.  Three reasons, with solid support, most important first.

    There's an overwhelming amount of peer reviewed scientific data that says that.  Short and long summaries.

    http://www.globalwarmingart.com/wiki/Ima...

    http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM2feb07.pdf

    Science is quite good about exposing bad science or hoaxes:

    http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/ATG/polywater...

    There's a large number of people who agree that it is, who are not liberals, environmentalists, stupid, or conceivably part of a "conspiracy".  Just four examples of many:

    "I wasn’t convinced by a person or any interest group—it was the data that got me. I was utterly convinced of this connection between the burning of fossil fuels and climate change. And I was convinced that if we didn’t do something about this, we would be in deep trouble.”

    Vice Admiral Richard H. Truly, USN (Ret.)

    Former NASA Administrator, Shuttle Astronaut and the first Commander of the Naval Space Command

    "Global warming is real, now, and it must be addressed."

    Lee Scott, CEO, Wal-Mart

    "Our nation has both an obligation and self-interest in facing head-on the serious environmental, economic and national security threat posed by global warming."

    Senator John McCain, Republican, Arizona

    “DuPont believes that action is warranted, not further debate."

    Charles O. Holliday, Jr., CEO, DuPont

    There's a lot less controversy about this is the real world than there is on Yahoo answers:

    http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/a...

    And vastly less controversy in the scientific community than you might guess from the few skeptics talked about here:

    http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/fu...

    Good websites for more info:

    http://profend.com/global-warming/

    http://www.realclimate.org

    "climate science from climate scientists"

    The "swindle" movie (and its' "science") is wrong.  It is simply a political statement which distorts science.  The director has a history of putting out misleading stuff.  In 1997 he made a series for Channel 4 called “Against Nature”, which compared environmentalists with n***s. Channel 4 had to apologise for the misleading stuff in that one.  The present movie is also a distortion of the science. More here:

    http://news.independent.co.uk/environmen...

    "A Channel 4 documentary claimed that climate change was a conspiratorial lie. But an analysis of the evidence it used shows the film was riddled with distortions and errors."

    http://www.medialens.org/alerts/07/0313p...

    "Pure Propaganda"

    http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/arc...

    Explanations of why the science is wrong.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Durk...

    History of the director.

    http://environment.guardian.co.uk/climat...

    "The science might be bunkum, the research discredited. But all that counts for Channel 4 is generating controversy."  

    Gore's movie may be a little over dramatic, but it has the basic science right.  This movie does not.

    Channel 4 itself undercuts the movie in a funny way.  If you go to their website on the movie you find links to real global warming information.  They also have a way to "Ask the Expert" about global warming.  The questions go to a respected mainstream scientist who supports (mostly) human responsibility for global warming.

  10. The Earth has many problems because of  man  

    this is undeniable ,how much we are responsible for  Global warming is debateble

                                  

    this text only covers some aspects of Climate change ,mainly agriculture i.e.effects of deforestation and subsequent man made desertification

    water and air polution such as caused by

    industrial contamination ,the contaminating effects of the cities(the internal combustion engine) ,are other stories,

    and all of these are also man made ,such as the high industrial chimneys pumping contamination into the clouds and the burning of tires,some of this polution has been found in the ice in the polar regions

    there are natural cycles in the planets life

    but a lot is influenced by mans existance ,and this is increasing with overpopulation,putting strains on Natural resources and increasing contaminations as well as destructions of essential componants the ensure living conditions for all life forms

    climate change is caused in great parts by desertification ,and most desertification is caused by man

    the thinner ozone layer helps to speed this up.and this is caused mainly by air polution ,also as a result of mans actions

    in North Africa,India,Mexico ,millions of people are effected by land loss and desertification and some have died as a result,

    And now many animals are becoming sick because of changes in temperature ,

    vital links in the food chains are disapearing affecting other species further along in the chain

    90% of the feral (wild) bee population in the United States has died out.

    In the Netherlands bee diversity is down 80 percent in the sites researched, and that "bee species are declining or have become extinct in Britain."

    wildflowers that depend on pollination have dropped by 70 percent

    we are witness to a mass exstinction ,for the first time since the dinosaurs, of the earth's estimated 10 million species, 300,000 have vanished in the past 50 years. each years, 3,000 to 30,000 species become extinct.

    everything is happening so fast it is not possible to monitor things any more.

    ,the Sahara is growing by 7 kilometers a year

    and most of the desserts we know are a results of mans actions ,and they are increasing ,not getting less ,in the dinosaurs days ,there were few desserts.

    collectively this planet is drying up ,

    each degree rise in temperature means 10%crop loss

    and there is less and less water (because of deforestation),to irrigate this production ,

    and there are less and less farmers to do it..

    Arable lands and their farms are lost all over the globe. Many farmers sons abandon farming and head for the cities.

    Northern China is drying up, what once were millions of food producing people, are now hungry refugees ,running for their lives from the all consuming dust storms.

    This will have a great effect on world food prices when they start buying at what ever cost, to feed their people.

    The farmers that are left have to feed some 70 million more people than the year before but with less topsoil.

    Over the last half century,

    Population growth & rising incomes have tripled world grain demand from 640 million tons to 1,855 million

    In the near future the global farming community will not be able to feed every body ,food prices will continue to rise. .

    RISING SEAS

    The northpole is melting ,and we will know it without ice in our life times.

    this does not affect the sea level because it is ice that is already in the water.but the melting ice from Green land and the south pole ,are another matter

    Global warming could be slowed down to some extent,but it will mean global co operation between all countries ,and taking into account human nature and the world politics ,it is unlikely that this will happen,

    At least not untill we are all in the middle of planetary disastres and it becomes a battle for the survival of humanity every where,instead of just some third world countries Source(s) here are a 100 ways to help

    http://www.eco-gaia.net/forum-pt/index.p...

    http://www.greenpeace.org/international/...

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/natur...

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 10 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.