"Macedonians",do you know who Pejrushan Jashar is???

Question

Was he friend with Sultan Memeti, Hajredin Halimi and Ruzdi Veliu.???

Answer 1

OK, I'm waiting for answers by Livio Troll, plostad, allan d and his dumb alias Partilac and Co. Where are they?

Answer 2

On 15 February 2007 the European Court of Human Rights ruled that Macedonia violated Article 3 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in connection with the ill-treatment by the police of Mr Pejrusan Jasar, a Macedonian national of Romani ethnic origin. On 16 April 1998, Mr Jasar, a Romani man from Stip, Macedonia, was in a local bar where gambling took place. One of the losing gamblers complained that the dice was fixed, drew a firearm and fired several gunshots. Several police officers were called to the bar. Mr Jasar maintains that police officers grabbed him by his hair and forcibly placed him in a police van. During his detention in police custody, he was kicked in the head, punched and beaten with a truncheon by a police officer. The medical report issued immediately after Mr Jasar was released the next morning stated that he had sustained numerous injuries to his head, hand and back. In May 1998, Mr Jasar, represented by local attorney Mr Jordan Madzunarov, in cooperation with the ERRC, filed a criminal complaint with the public prosecutor against an unidentified police officer. More - 12 -

than eight years later, no steps were taken to investigate the complaint. At the same time, Mr Jasar also began civil proceedings for damages against the State, which were dismissed in October 1999. Having exhausted available domestic remedies, the ERRC and Mr Jordan Madzunarov filed a claim on behalf of Mr Jasar against Macedonia on 1 February 2001 with the European Court of Human Rights. The applicant complained under Article 3 of the Convention that he had been subjected to acts of police brutality amounting to torture, inhuman and/or degrading treatment. Mr Jasar also argued that the prosecuting authority’s failure to carry out any official investigation capable of leading to the identification and punishment of the police officers responsible for the ill-treatment constituted a procedural violation of Article 3. Finally, Mr Jasar argued that he did not have access to an effective remedy with respect to the prosecuting authority’s failure to investigate his allegations of ill-treatment, in violation of Article 13 of the Convention, read in conjunction with Article 3.

In its ruling, the European Court of Human Rights recalled that where an individual makes a credible assertion that he has suffered treatment infringing Article 3 at the hands of the police or other agents of the State, that provision, read in conjunction with the State’s general duty under Article 1 of the Convention to “secure to everyone within their jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in … [the] Convention”, requires that there be an effective official investigation. Such an investigation should be capable of leading to the identification and punishment of those responsible. The Court emphasised that, “it is particularly striking that the public prosecutor did not undertake any investigative measures after receiving the criminal complaint.” The Court also noted that “the national authorities took no steps to identify who was present when the applicant was apprehended or when his injuries were received, nor is there any indication that any witnesses, police officers concerned or the doctor, who had examined the applicant, were questioned about the applicant’s injuries. Furthermore, the public prosecutor took no steps to find any evidence confirming or contradicting the account given by the applicant as to the alleged ill-treatment… In addition, the inactivity of the prosecutor prevented the applicant from taking over the investigation as a subsidiary complainant and denied him access to the subsequent proceedings before the court.” Having regard to the lack of any investigation into the allegations made by Mr Jasar that he had been ill-treated by the police while in custody, the Court held that Macedonia violated Article 3 of the Convention and awarded non-pecuniary damages to the victim. Two are two other cases of similar legal nature filed by Romani victims of police abuse await decision by the European Court of Human Rights.21

The Stip-based NGO “Cerenje” reported that within 8 months following the judgment of the European Court Mr. Jasar was again severely beaten by the police. The incident happened on November 2, 2007 around 10.30 am, when the police detained Pejrushan as guardian of his nephew Turkmen who was allegedly involved in a theft. While he was in the police vehicle, the officers offended and threatened him for talking in Romani language with his nephew. Later on he was beaten in the police station with clubs and wooden sticks and a policeman even kicked him. The ambulance arrived around 11.00 upon the call of a representative of “Cerenje”. Pejrushan Jashar was hospitalized for several days as he sustained a broken rib and contusions.

The case of the beaten Roma, Pejrushan Jashar, by the Stip police was reported to the

Committee by the Stip-based NGO “Cerenje”. The incident happened on November 2, 2007 around

10.30 am, when the police detained Pejrushan as guardian of his nephew Turkmen who was allegedly

involved in a theft. While he was in the police vehicle, the officers offended and threatened him for

talking in Roma language with his nephew, while later in the police station they started to beat him

with clubs, wooden sticks and to kick him. The ambulance arrived around 11.00 upon the call of

“Cerenje” member. The police said the citizen was attacking a police officer, preventing him from

doing his job.

Pejrushan Jashar was hospitalized for several days as he sustained a broken rib and contusions. The

case was reported to the media and we believe the Sector has sufficient information to investigate

the case officially.

The factual situation, though in the specific case is presented by the complainant, is a sufficient

indicator of possible abuse of official position of the police officers by using excessive violence. In

some of the cases there are clear elements indicating use of violence to extract statement or

confession of the citizens, which clearly suggests resorting to a torture. [1]

The Helsinki Committee notes that the increased number of cases in a short period of time is

concerning. The Committee believes (and appeals) that the Sector of Internal Control and

Professional Standards will undertake certain activities in order to conduct an objective investigation

in all cases and establish whether the police officers involved in these cases were responsible for the

alleged abuses. The Committee will continue to monitor these cases.

Another example of FYROM violence and corruption

Answer 3

Good job Mad Greek

But you should refer to these people as FYROMIANS or Vardascars

because it ruins the good reputation and NAME of the Greek Macedonians for they take their virtues from Alexander the Great.