"Old horses never win races" - It's time to replace Old players with bunch of Young bloods? Yes No?

Question

a. Yes You are 100% correct. Sachin, Dravid, Ganguly, Laxman, Anil Kumble all are age old. It's time for them to announce their retirement immediately. Otherwise, they will not get respect in future. Worst Batting, Very Very Worst Fielding. Fielding is the key factor in both form of cricket. Indian team fielding is at worst.

b. No we want to see more and more defeats. We want to see sachin, sourav, dravid, and laxman scoring single digit run and "ducks" frequently. So let them play. We will enjoy Worst Indian Cricket.

c. Comment

Answer 1

A

Answer 2

Yes.

Answer 3

Good bye to Old horses

Answer 4

You cant say that easily... these old horses fought very bravily in Australia  

Answer 5

yeh and young horses wins

you were the same peoples who wanted old players to come back when india lost in asia cup finals?lolololololol

Answer 6

Yes ofcourse.Let the old horses coach the youngones and watch them win.

Answer 7

Kumble is going to retire soon anyway, so hes going to go.

Sachin and Dravids places should never be questioned, they have still got about another 2-4 years.

Laxman has been doing fairly well this year.

If Ganguly doesnt perform against the aussies he should be dropped.

so the team will get a lot younger ater the australian series.

Gambhir aged 26

Sehwag aged 29

Dravid aged 35

Sachin aged 35

Laxman aged 33

Sharma/Badrinath/Kaif/Yuvraj/ or Ganguly if in form

Dhoni aged 27

Bhaji aged 27

Khan aged 29

RP Singh aged 22

Ishant aged 19

You need experince in the side. Plus none of teh young indian batsmen are good enough to re[lace Laxman. let alone sachin and dravid.

EDIT:

Australia has loads of old people in there team, example, Hayden 37, Ponting 34, Symonds 32, Hussey 32, Lee 31, Stuart 32.

Point proven.

Answer 8

100% you are absolutely right and replace them with Young blood with out wasting time.

Seniors GO,GO,

old horses bye,bye,

Answer 9

No. I don't accept it... Old players should never be replaced by the younger ones. Even if we have played with the young players, the result would not have been different. I can give a couple of examples. Yousuf pathan was given a chance in Asia cup, he failed..Rohit Sharma was given a chance to field in srilanka, he misfielded n no.of times and also missed a couple of runouts.

The stage will be definitely different..any one can play at home..but the best are those who play abroad and win..

Old horses might not win races, but old is gold.

Answer 10

yes

Answer 11

Kumble is ageing, you are right 100 percent

Answer 12

Man i feel its not correct to object against the experianced players and force them to retire, you see this Indian team can be compared to anyone in sports such as - AC Milan, Milan have aged players but they won the champions league and lost it the next year, so its pretty even you know, and another example of England's 1-2 series loss against South Africa, what do you say about that - England lost it with pretty young players with the likes of - Cook - 23, Strauss - 30,Vaughan - 34 , Bell - 24 , Pietersen - 28 , Flintoff - 30 , Ambrose - 24 , Broad - 24 , Sidebottom - 29 , Panesar - 25 , Anderson - 25 and Collingwood - 31. How about that 80% of those players age between 20 and 30 and still lose a series 2 - 1, same as India 2 - 1. This shouls even the odds now, and there is no question of age in sports, the great W.G Grace who played till the age of 61, Steve Waugh played till 40 years of age.  

Answer 13

no

Answer 14

100% correct and I agree with you.

Answer 15

HAVE YOU EVER HOLD A BAT??? VERY EASY TO SIT ON UR *** AND TYPE ON PC AND WHAT IS THIS A, B OPTION IS IT POLLS AND SURVEYS SECTION??

THE PERSON ABOVE IS CALLED "TEARS NAFEEZ" THE 2 FACE GUY...LOLOLOLOLOL