"the mummy" was good, "the mummy 2" sucked. how about "the mummy 3" ?

Question

"the mummy" was good, "the mummy 2" sucked. how about "the mummy 3" ?

Answer 1

It really sucked! I wasted my money. Plus Jet Li didn't come in until the last 20 minutes of the movie. Thumbs down!

Answer 2

haven't seen it and won't. they didn't do their homework.  not only is the dragon pictured not a dragon but a hydra (3 heads?) but oriental dragons wouldn't attack like that...they're more tricksters and very intelligent...more than humans.  plus they look different (more serpentine).  plus it's just not even remotely historically accurate.  at least imhotep actually existed.

Answer 3

The Mummy 3 movie review and some plot info (no spoilers):

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article...  

Answer 4

it is less entertaining than previous 2 movies

historically very unaccurate, too

Answer 5

I thought they were all good http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...

Answer 6

That's the usual way it goes. Same as Pirates of the Caribbean. 1 was good, 2 sucked and 3 was REALLY terrible.

They launch a good movie. Then try to milk it for what it's worth. So I expect the Mummy 3 will not be worth watching.